Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=1GXFx488zXASvw249uVCnhzTZLDV19KcQAaMwUFJTgMQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> How about parallel_leader_participation = on|off?  The attached
>> version has it that way, and adds regression tests to exercise on, off
>> and off-but-couldn't-start-any-workers for both kinds of gather node.
>
> This looks mostly fine to me, but I think the documentation is strange:
>
> +        Allows the leader process to execute the query plan under
> +        <literal>Gather</literal> and <literal>Gather Merge</literal> nodes
> +        instead of waiting for worker processes.  The default is
> +        <literal>on</literal>.  Setting this value to <literal>on</literal>
> +        can cause the leader process to begin producing tuples sooner instead
> +        of waiting for worker processes to start up, but might in some cases
> +        also cause workers to become blocked waiting for the leader to clear
> +        tuple queues.
>
> This documentation would seem exactly right to me if the default value
> were off, but as it is it seems kinda backwards, because it's
> explaining why you might want to set the value to what is anyway the
> default.  Also, it's always possible for the workers to become blocked
> waiting for the leader, regardless of how this GUC is set.  It becomes
> more likely when this turned off, but that's not quite the same thing.

Thanks.  You're right.  Rebased and updated to describe what "off" does.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrea Adami
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Row Level Security Bug ?
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: FP16 Support?