Re: Updated macOS start scripts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Dilger
Subject Re: Updated macOS start scripts
Date
Msg-id F8F64F48-C070-41C1-A1EE-1F25836B6FAF@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Updated macOS start scripts  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Updated macOS start scripts  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Updated macOS start scripts  (Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On Nov 15, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Nov 15, 2017, at 8:32 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> The stuff in contrib/start-scripts/osx/ does not, as far as I know,
>>> work at all on any recent release of macOS, because SystemStarter
>>> is long gone.  I propose replacing it with the attached, which
>>> I've tested on current-vintage Macs.
>
>> Overall, I think supporting 10.10 and greater is more relevant than continuing
>> to support 10.4 and earlier, though I suppose someone could argue for
>> keeping both in side-by-side files with the README directing users which to
>> use for whichever version of OS X they happen to be running.  It's of no
>> consequence to me, since my oldest mac is running 10.6.8, but somebody
>> from the museum of old macs might feel differently.
>
> Well, we have no buildfarm coverage before 10.4, so to my mind those
> releases are desupported already.  In practice I wonder whether anyone
> is really running PG on such old releases anyway.  Certainly I wouldn't
> think they'd be making new PG installations on machines that old.

I have tested this on 10.11.6. I had no trouble following the instructions
in the README and everything worked as described.

As far as I can tell, this patch has not yet been submitted to any commitfest.
I would mark it Read for Committer.

mark



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg audit requirements
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues with logical replication