Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures
Date
Msg-id 21776.1510701285@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 11/14/17 11:14, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... Do we really want the existence of
>> a function foo(int) to mean that you can't create a SQL procedure named
>> foo and taking one int argument?

> Yes, that is defined that way by the SQL standard.

Meh.  OK, then it has to be one catalog.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures