On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Michael Paquier <
michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> <
fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Michael Paquier <
michael.paquier@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> - Let's restrict the logging to a role name instead of a database
> >> name, and let's parametrize it with a setting in the temporary
> >> configuration file. Let's not bother about multiple role support with
> >> a list, for the sake of tests and simplicity only defining one role
> >> looks fine to me. Comments in the code should be clear about the
> >> dependency.
> >
> > Makes sense and simplify the test code. Fixed.
>
> + if (!strcmp(username, "regress_sess_hook_usr2"))
> + {
> + const char *dbname;
> [...]
> +++ b/src/test/modules/test_session_hooks/session_hooks.conf
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +shared_preload_libraries = 'test_session_hooks'
> Don't you think that this should be a GUC? My previous comment
> outlined that. I won't fight hard on that point in any case, don't
> worry. I just want to make things clear :)
>
Ooops... my fault... fixed!
Thanks again!!
