Re: [HACKERS] PG10 partitioning - odd behavior/possible bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG10 partitioning - odd behavior/possible bug
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobXEEjpoJ8jDy5Z0UmpzOPF9hQLNDMB72hRX3BfSe7opg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG10 partitioning - odd behavior/possible bug  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
> Yeah, Tom already pointed that out a while back:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20986.1504478066%40sss.pgh.pa.us

Ah, sorry, hadn't seen that.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG10 partitioning - odd behavior/possible bug
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: default range partition and constraint exclusion