Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqT-b8VTQEhJSNA380g66dgsYT-dAcH_mOqaPG9HCYp9uw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> It looks amazingly simple from here. Which probably means there's more to it
> that I haven't seen yet. I could use advice from someone who knows the
> locking subsystem better.

The status of this patch is I think not correct. It is marked as
waiting on author but Nikhil has showed up and has written an updated
patch. So I am moving it to next CF with "needs review".
-- 
Michael


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key