Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzk19G5=RxQpgfUirRvihjrMvZSMSi=u53TbMbvLj1+5vA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Maybe it's a stupid question. But would we still want to have this after
> the change? These should be just specializations of the template version
> imo.

I also wonder why regression test output has changed. Wasn't this
supposed to be a mechanical change in how the templating is
implemented? Why would the behavior of the algorithm change, even if
the change is only a change in the output order among equal elements?

Also, is that one last raw CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in the template
definition supposed to be there?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgindent run?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: Add support for INSERT OVERRIDING clause