Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqS4JRP_xyO3YCuBktGhTkDMRvg3-WBTgLqwpnLrtx-Qzg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples  (Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> Maybe it's a stupid question. But would we still want to have this after
>> the change? These should be just specializations of the template version
>> imo.
>
> I also wonder why regression test output has changed. Wasn't this
> supposed to be a mechanical change in how the templating is
> implemented? Why would the behavior of the algorithm change, even if
> the change is only a change in the output order among equal elements?
>
> Also, is that one last raw CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in the template
> definition supposed to be there?

As work is still going on here I am moving the patch to next CF.
-- 
Michael


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Range Merge Join v1
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 4) and patchfor hash index