Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Beena Emerson
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Date
Msg-id CAOG9ApFWrphu5dvM+xvop21zuX_moa+1CwhgwNE8rT2QEhfLgg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello,

PFA the new version of the patch which can be applied over v11 patches
of Amit Langote [1]. The patch has been completely modified and the
0001 patch of previous series is no longer required. As mentioned
above, I have used the PartitionDispatchInfo and an array to which
holds the actual subplan index.

This one addresses the problems mentioned above but still needs to be
thoroughly tested. I will soon post a new patch rebased over Amit's
v13 patches[2] soon with additional code comments.



[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/62d21a7b-fea9-f2d7-c33a-8caa12eca612%40lab.ntt.co.jp
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/df609168-b7fd-4c0b-e9b2-6e398d411e27%40lab.ntt.co.jp


-- 

Beena Emerson

EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY
Next
From: Beena Emerson
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning