Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQo8mCVnnRFG=V1w2zqLdnbsGw7kcL8jwf1Or7Q9qxXXQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:51 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> I think that isolation tests should be improved.  It doesn't seems that any
> posting tree would be generated by the tests that you've provided, because
> all the TIDs could fit the single posting list.  Note, that you can get some
> insight into GIN physical structure using pageinspect contrib.

This thread had no updates for almost two months, so I am marking it
as returned with feedback.
-- 
Michael


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 : Patch for predicate locking in Gist index
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Causal reads take II