Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Date
Msg-id 6de87398-a9da-aa8b-a4c2-ca06ef8d757c@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/28/17 17:33, Michael Paquier wrote:
> 1) Have a special value in the parameter saslchannelbinding proposed
> in patch 0001. For example by specifying "none" then no channel
> binding is used.

I was thinking if it's empty then don't use channel binding.  Right now,
empty means the same thing as tls-unique.  In any case, some variant of
that should be fine.  I don't think we need a separate server option
that this point.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add PGDLLIMPORT lines to some variables