Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 August 1999

00:44 ... Hub.Org News Admin
01:32 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Bruce Momjian
03:29 Re: Patches for Postgresql on Linux/Alpha! Thomas Lockhart
04:01 initdb needed for newest sources Tom Lane
05:36 Re: Bug#41277: postgresql 6.5.1-3 + sparc (sun4u) == nasty nasty crashes Oliver Elphick
14:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bug#41277: postgresql 6.5.1-3 + sparc (sun4u) == nasty nasty crashes Tom Lane
16:01 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bug#41277: postgresql 6.5.1-3 + sparc (sun4u) == nasty nasty crashes Michael Alan Dorman
18:03 Re: [HACKERS] IPC Memory problem with Postmaster on BSDi 4.x J. Michael Roberts
19:17 Re: [HACKERS] IPC Memory problem with Postmaster on BSDi 4.x Bruce Momjian
20:07 Re: [HACKERS] IPC Memory problem with Postmaster on BSDi 4.x Thomas Lockhart
20:25 Re: [HACKERS] initdb needed for newest sources Thomas Lockhart
21:02 Re: [HACKERS] IPC Memory problem with Postmaster on BSDi 4.x Bruce Momjian
21:21 [HACKERS] Installation procedure. J. Michael Roberts

2 August 1999

02:33 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure. Thomas Lockhart
02:52 Re: [HACKERS] IPC Memory problem with Postmaster on BSDi 4.x Tom Lane
02:54 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure. J. Michael Roberts
03:03 Re: [HACKERS] initdb needed for newest sources Tom Lane
03:16 Re: [HACKERS] IPC Memory problem with Postmaster on BSDi 4.x J. Michael Roberts
03:34 [HACKERS] A suggestion on finding those pesky .so files J. Michael Roberts
03:48 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure. Tom Lane
03:56 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure. J. Michael Roberts
04:11 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure. Tom Lane
04:23 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure. The Hermit Hacker
04:24 Re: [HACKERS] A suggestion on finding those pesky .so files Tom Lane
04:42 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure. Thomas Lockhart
05:14 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bug#41277: postgresql 6.5.1-3 + sparc (sun4u) == nasty nasty crashes Adam Di Carlo
08:00 Optimizer hints John Ridout
11:37 [GENERAL] database access authentication: crypted passwords Oleg Broytmann
11:42 Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer hints Hannu Krosing
11:42 [GENERAL] read-only databases Oleg Broytmann
11:57 RE: [HACKERS] Optimizer hints John Ridout
12:18 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] database access authentication: crypted passwords Gene Sokolov
12:20 Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? G. Anthony Reina
12:37 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] database access authentication: crypted passwords Oleg Broytmann
13:17 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? Tom Lane
13:23 flex (was Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure.) Tom Lane
13:31 Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer hints Bruce Momjian
13:47 Re: flex (was Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure.) Thomas Lockhart
14:31 Re: flex (was Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure.) Bruce Momjian
14:39 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? G. Anthony Reina
14:51 ... The Hermit Hacker
14:52 Re: flex (was Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure.) J. Michael Roberts
15:28 bytea type and precision. Michael J Schout
15:31 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? Bruce Momjian
15:50 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? Tom Lane
15:54 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? G. Anthony Reina
15:57 Re: flex (was Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure.) Tom Lane
16:03 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? Bruce Momjian
16:09 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? G. Anthony Reina
16:31 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? G. Anthony Reina
17:24 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? Tom Lane
17:49 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? G. Anthony Reina
19:00 Any 6.5.2 activities ? Oleg Bartunov
19:27 Selectivity estimates paper, and Mariposa Ross J. Reedstrom
19:45 Re: [HACKERS] Selectivity estimates paper, and Mariposa Bruce Momjian
19:53 Re: [HACKERS] Any 6.5.2 activities ? The Hermit Hacker
20:09 Re: Selectivity estimates paper, and Mariposa Tom Lane
21:24 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Ross J. Reedstrom
21:31 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Tom Lane
21:52 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Tom Lane

3 August 1999

01:31 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Bruce Momjian
01:31 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Bruce Momjian
02:38 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Ross J. Reedstrom
02:43 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Bruce Momjian
08:04 RE: John Ridout
10:26 Re: [HACKERS] RE: Hannu Krosing
12:33 || PostgreSQL Duane Currie
12:57 Threads Duane Currie
13:05 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Tom Lane
13:21 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Thomas Lockhart
13:24 Mega-commits to "stable" version Tom Lane
13:25 Re: [HACKERS] || PostgreSQL Thomas Lockhart
13:37 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Tom Lane
13:39 RE: [HACKERS] Threads Ansley, Michael
13:40 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Dmitry Samersoff
13:44 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Duane Currie
13:47 Re: [HACKERS] Mega-commits to "stable" version Thomas Lockhart
13:57 Re: [HACKERS] || PostgreSQL Ross J. Reedstrom
14:13 Re: bad select performance fixed by forbidding hash joins Tom Lane
14:14 Re: [HACKERS] Threads The Hermit Hacker
14:15 ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Adriaan Joubert
14:20 Re: [HACKERS] Mega-commits to "stable" version The Hermit Hacker
14:40 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Tom Lane
14:47 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Tom Lane
14:57 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Ross J. Reedstrom
14:58 Curiosity on deferred/delayed balancing btrees Colin McCormack
15:03 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Vince Vielhaber
15:11 Re: [HACKERS] Threads The Hermit Hacker
15:12 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Bruce Momjian
15:14 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Tom Lane
15:19 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Bruce Momjian
15:20 RE: [HACKERS] Threads Magnus Hagander
15:20 Re: [HACKERS] Curiosity on deferred/delayed balancing btrees Bruce Momjian
15:34 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Duane Currie
15:35 RE: [HACKERS] Threads Magnus Hagander
15:49 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Tom Lane
16:00 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Tom Lane
16:39 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Bob Devine
16:41 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Bruce Momjian
17:28 Re: [HACKERS] Mega-commits to "stable" version Hannu Krosing
17:35 Backup database with entries > 8192 KBytes G. Anthony Reina
17:45 Re: [HACKERS] Mega-commits to "stable" version The Hermit Hacker
17:47 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Ross J. Reedstrom
22:58 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Lamar Owen

4 August 1999

05:01 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Adriaan Joubert
11:07 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Don Baccus
11:53 RE: [HACKERS] Threads Magnus Hagander
11:59 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Brian E Gallew
12:48 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Tom Lane
13:09 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Tom Lane
13:29 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Thomas Lockhart
13:54 Re: [HACKERS] Threads The Hermit Hacker
14:43 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Thomas Lockhart
14:45 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Adriaan Joubert
15:02 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Tom Lane
15:21 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Threads eem21@cam.ac.uk
16:03 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Michael Alan Dorman
16:37 Re: [HACKERS] Threads The Hermit Hacker
21:15 Re: [HACKERS] Backup database with entries > 8192 KBytes Tom Lane
21:35 Re: [HACKERS] Backup database with entries > 8192 KBytes G. Anthony Reina
22:01 parse_coerce question Tom Lane
23:01 Re: [HACKERS] parse_coerce question Bruce Momjian

5 August 1999

00:19 INTERSECT/EXCEPT and duplicates? Tatsuo Ishii
00:45 Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT/EXCEPT and duplicates? Bruce Momjian
01:50 ... Hub.Org News Admin
02:58 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Vadim Mikheev
03:22 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? The Hermit Hacker
03:40 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Tom Lane
04:17 Re: PG 6.5.1 RPMS Thomas Lockhart
04:19 Re: [HACKERS] parse_coerce question Thomas Lockhart
12:32 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Adriaan Joubert
12:43 Email Peter Mount
13:10 Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT/EXCEPT and duplicates? Tom Lane
13:23 Re: [HACKERS] parse_coerce question Tom Lane
13:42 Re: [HACKERS] parse_coerce question Thomas Lockhart
13:53 New man pages Thomas Lockhart
13:53 Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Tom Lane
14:08 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Bruce Momjian
14:13 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Threads Ewan Mellor
14:15 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Tom Lane
15:01 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Bruce Momjian
15:12 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Tom Lane
15:18 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Bruce Momjian
16:31 Re: PG 6.5.1 RPMS Lamar Owen

6 August 1999

01:19 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Vadim Mikheev
01:37 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Bruce Momjian
02:12 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Vadim Mikheev
02:32 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Bruce Momjian
03:03 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Vadim Mikheev
03:38 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Tom Lane
04:31 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Bruce Momjian
07:02 RE: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Ansley, Michael
07:17 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Vadim Mikheev
07:26 [PHP3] mysql is case sensitive? (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
08:03 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Adriaan Joubert
09:00 6.5.2 Vadim Mikheev
12:53 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Tom Lane
12:54 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.2 Tom Lane
14:03 Re: [DOCS] New man pages Bruce Momjian
14:30 Re: [DOCS] New man pages Thomas Lockhart
14:42 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1, error in pg_dump Don Baccus
14:55 Re: [DOCS] New man pages Bruce Momjian
15:43 Unable to create tables... Don Baccus
17:15 Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Lamar Owen
17:27 plpgsql requires bison Bruce Momjian
17:29 Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Don Baccus
17:55 Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Don Baccus
18:47 Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Ross J. Reedstrom
18:55 Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Lamar Owen
19:01 Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Don Baccus
19:01 Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Don Baccus
21:03 OT: pgsql-ayuda. It´s working? F J Cuberos
21:26 Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql requires bison Tom Lane
21:37 Release 2 testing RPMS -- includes ALPHA patches. Lamar Owen
21:50 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1, error in pg_dump Tom Lane
22:06 Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql requires bison Bruce Momjian
23:32 Re: [PORTS] Release 2 testing RPMS -- includes ALPHA patches. Uncle George

7 August 1999

03:13 Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql requires bison Tom Lane
03:14 Re: [PORTS] Release 2 testing RPMS -- includes ALPHA patches. lamar.owen@wgcr.org
03:25 Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql requires bison Bruce Momjian
07:00 Inefficiencies in COPY command Wayne Piekarski
07:17 Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV on CREATE FUNCTION with plpgsql Wayne Piekarski
14:02 Re: [HACKERS] Inefficiencies in COPY command Tom Lane
14:49 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1, error in pg_dump Don Baccus

8 August 1999

18:57 plpgsql grammar fix not so easy after all Tom Lane
23:09 Re: plpgsql grammar fix not so easy after all Bruce Momjian

9 August 1999

01:59 Descending order Index scan patch Hiroshi Inoue
02:05 ... Hub.Org News Admin
03:43 Re: [PATCHES] Descending order Index scan patch Bruce Momjian
09:35 Re: plpgsql requires bison wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
12:29 Re: [HACKERS] New man pages José Soares
13:12 Re: [HACKERS] New man pages Thomas Lockhart
13:47 Re: [HACKERS] New man pages Bruce Momjian
14:56 Re: [HACKERS] New man pages Thomas Good
15:11 Re: autoconf does not recognize HP-UX 11.00. Ryan Bradetich
16:49 Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Lamar Owen
18:17 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Peter Eisentraut
18:55 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) J. Michael Roberts
19:33 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Ross J. Reedstrom
21:38 Re: [HACKERS] Re: autoconf does not recognize HP-UX 11.00. Tom Lane
23:07 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Lamar Owen

10 August 1999

01:18 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Thomas Lockhart
01:41 New man pages Thomas Lockhart
01:56 Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Bruce Momjian
02:05 Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Thomas Lockhart
02:08 Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Bruce Momjian
02:17 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) lamar.owen@wgcr.org
02:22 Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Thomas Lockhart
02:30 Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Bruce Momjian
02:32 Re: RPMs (was Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL") Thomas Lockhart
03:00 Re: RPMs (was Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL") lamar.owen@wgcr.org
11:47 linuxdev.net poll results Vince Vielhaber
11:48 Re: [HACKERS] WAL: parallel logging Vadim Mikheev
11:49 another DECIMAL problem José Soares
11:49 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Oliver Elphick
11:53 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Thomas Lockhart
11:56 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Thomas Good
12:16 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Thomas Lockhart
12:16 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Oliver Elphick
12:18 Re: [HACKERS] another DECIMAL problem Thomas Lockhart
12:26 [INTERFACES] spi, tuples Collin F. Lynch
12:42 Re: [HACKERS] [INTERFACES] spi, tuples Thomas Lockhart
13:29 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Tom Lane
13:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Ross J. Reedstrom
13:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Thomas Lockhart
13:48 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Brook Milligan
14:03 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Tom Lane
14:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Oliver Elphick
14:19 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Tom Lane
15:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Brook Milligan
15:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Bruce Momjian
15:56 Re: [HACKERS] another DECIMAL problem Bruce Momjian
16:01 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Bruce Momjian
16:02 Drop table abort Jackson, DeJuan
16:27 Re: (fwd) Problems with Postgres Oliver Elphick
16:50 Drop table abort Jackson, DeJuan
17:01 Re: [HACKERS] Drop table abort Bruce Momjian
18:43 Re: [HACKERS] Re: (fwd) Problems with Postgres Oliver Elphick
20:10 ... Hub.Org News Admin
20:22 Re: [HACKERS] Re: (fwd) Problems with Postgres Tom Lane
20:34 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Tom Lane
20:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: (fwd) Problems with Postgres Oliver Elphick
20:47 RE: [HACKERS] Drop table abort Jackson, DeJuan
21:01 Crisp text editor Bruce Momjian
21:25 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor (probably OT) Hannu Krosing
21:56 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor (probably OT) Bruce Momjian

11 August 1999

01:03 Crisp pricing Bruce Momjian
02:11 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Thomas Lockhart
03:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Bruce Momjian
04:32 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor Oleg Bartunov
05:20 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor (probably OT) Hannu Krosing
05:21 libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Constantin Teodorescu
05:33 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor Michael Robinson
09:52 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp pricing Vince Vielhaber
11:24 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Thomas Lockhart
11:28 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Constantin Teodorescu
11:34 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Thomas Lockhart
11:47 Query length string Ansley, Michael
12:01 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Constantin Teodorescu
12:23 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Thomas Lockhart
13:16 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Bruce Momjian
13:17 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor [definitely OT] Tom Lane
13:20 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor [definitely OT] Bruce Momjian
13:58 Re: [HACKERS] Query length string Tom Lane
14:06 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor [definitely OT] Tom Lane
14:56 Re: [HACKERS] Query length string Ross J. Reedstrom
19:03 Testing RPMS -- 6.5.1-3lo ready. Lamar Owen
19:47 We won! Tom Lockhart
19:53 RE: We won! Vince Vielhaber

12 August 1999

01:18 ... Hub.Org News Admin
01:59 Re: We won! Vadim Mikheev
02:25 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Philip Warner
05:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Theo Kramer
07:37 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Hannu Krosing
07:49 Index access using multi-column indices Hiroshi Inoue
12:29 Query string length Ansley, Michael
12:30 FW: Query string length Ansley, Michael
13:38 "20L" not interpreted as text. Collin F. Lynch
13:41 ... Hub.Org News Admin
13:45 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor [definitely OT] Daniel Lundin
17:31 ... Hub.Org News Admin
20:13 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Kaare Rasmussen
20:24 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Vince Vielhaber
22:00 Re: [HACKERS] "20L" not interpreted as text. Tom Lane
22:26 Aborted Transaction During Vacuum G. Anthony Reina
22:50 Followup to: Aborted Transaction During Vacuum G. Anthony Reina
23:35 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Vadim Mikheev

13 August 1999

00:30 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Tom Lane
03:10 Single row fetch from backend Theo Kramer
05:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
05:31 Index scan? Theo Kramer
06:49 ... Hub.Org News Admin
07:34 Unlimited query strings Ansley, Michael
08:52 COPY Theo Kramer
09:25 Token length limit Ansley, Michael
09:37 behavior of setlocale under FreeBSD 3.1 Oleg Bartunov
12:06 Re: [HACKERS] COPYz Marc Howard Zuckman
13:13 Re: [HACKERS] COPY Tom Lane
13:14 Re: [HACKERS] Token length limit Tom Lane
13:25 RE: [HACKERS] Token length limit Ansley, Michael
13:36 Re: [HACKERS] Index scan? Tom Lane
13:44 Re: [HACKERS] Single row fetch from backend Tom Lane
13:59 PROPOSAL: Statement for one-sided joins Evan Simpson
14:24 Re: We won! Bruce Momjian
14:27 Re: [HACKERS] COPY Theo Kramer
14:28 Re: [HACKERS] Index scan? Theo Kramer
14:32 Re: [HACKERS] Single row fetch from backend Theo Kramer
14:53 Re: We won! Vince Vielhaber
15:22 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Massimo Dal Zotto
15:59 Re: [HACKERS] Index scan? Bruce Momjian
16:20 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum G. Anthony Reina
16:32 Re: [HACKERS] Single row fetch from backend Bruce Momjian
16:38 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Tom Lane
16:51 Re: [HACKERS] Index scan? Tom Lane
17:00 Re: [HACKERS] PROPOSAL: Statement for one-sided joins Tom Lane
17:05 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Oliver Elphick
17:10 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Tom Lane
17:29 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Oliver Elphick
17:34 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum G. Anthony Reina
19:38 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum G. Anthony Reina
20:23 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Tom Lane
20:33 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Tom Lane
21:18 Ah-hah, I see the problem: EndPortalAllocMode() Tom Lane
22:31 How to get 'psql -q' runs really quiet ? Oleg Bartunov

14 August 1999

03:05 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum G. Anthony Reina
04:34 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Thomas Lockhart
12:13 Re: [HACKERS] Single row fetch from backend Theo Kramer
12:54 Re: [HACKERS] Single row fetch from backend Thomas Lockhart
13:29 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Tom Lane
13:47 Re: [BUGS] UNIQUE constraint no longer works under 6.5.1 Tom Lane
13:54 Re: [HACKERS] How to get 'psql -q' runs really quiet ? Tom Lane
14:10 Re: [SQL] Anyone recognise this error from PL/pgSQL? Tom Lane
14:18 Re: [BUGS] UNIQUE constraint no longer works under 6.5.1 Thomas Lockhart
14:27 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Anyone recognise this error from PL/pgSQL? Thomas Lockhart
14:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Anyone recognise this error from PL/pgSQL? Tom Lane
22:41 ... Hub.Org News Admin
22:54 Re: [BUGS] UNIQUE constraint no longer works under 6.5.1 Thomas Lockhart

15 August 1999

03:43 Re: [HACKERS] How to get 'psql -q' runs really quiet ? Bruce Momjian
12:56 Re: Returned mail: User unknown Bruce Momjian
13:14 psql return code for NOTICE Bruce Momjian
13:23 Statement Triggers. Ideas & help. F J Cuberos
21:37 RE: [HACKERS] Statement Triggers. Ideas & help. F J Cuberos

16 August 1999

01:24 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker
01:24 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) The Hermit Hacker
01:28 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! The Hermit Hacker
01:57 Re: [HACKERS] New man pages The Hermit Hacker
01:57 libpq drops error messages received just before backend crash Tom Lane
02:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: autoconf does not recognize HP-UX 11.00. The Hermit Hacker
02:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages The Hermit Hacker
02:05 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages The Hermit Hacker
02:06 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages The Hermit Hacker
03:36 WIN32 + MB fix Tatsuo Ishii
05:16 Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Thomas Lockhart
06:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
07:19 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Theo Kramer
08:08 ... Oleg Bartunov
08:37 backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
08:49 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.2 Oleg Broytmann
11:10 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
11:11 Re: your mail The Hermit Hacker
11:27 Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
11:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
11:34 Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
13:07 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Tom Lane
13:35 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
13:37 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Vince Vielhaber
13:51 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Tom Lane
14:01 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
14:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Theo Kramer
15:06 Binary cursors, numerics and other types Theo Kramer
15:20 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
15:42 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
15:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
16:08 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Chris Faylor
16:09 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Vince Vielhaber
16:39 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
16:48 Long table names Finn Kettner
16:54 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursors, numerics and other types Tom Lane
17:02 Re: [HACKERS] Long table names Bruce Momjian
17:19 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursors, numerics and other types Theo Kramer
17:30 Re: [HACKERS] Long table names Ross J. Reedstrom
19:13 Re: plpgsql requires bison Bruce Momjian
19:30 Re: [HACKERS] RECODE patches Bruce Momjian
19:33 Re: [HACKERS] README.locale patch 2 Bruce Momjian
20:17 Re: [HACKERS] Long table names Tom Lane
20:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail Hannu Krosing
23:42 Why does make_noname insert a SeqScan above sort/material node? Tom Lane

17 August 1999

00:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Vadim Mikheev
00:27 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.2 Vadim Mikheev
00:34 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Tatsuo Ishii
00:38 Re: [HACKERS] Why does make_noname insert a SeqScan above sort/material node? Bruce Momjian
00:43 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Vince Vielhaber
00:56 Re: [HACKERS] Statement Triggers. Ideas & help. Vadim Mikheev
00:57 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
00:58 Re: [HACKERS] Index access using multi-column indices Vadim Mikheev
01:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Vadim Mikheev
02:58 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
04:29 Re: [HACKERS] Statement Triggers. Ideas & help. Philip Warner
05:13 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Thomas Lockhart
05:30 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursors, numerics and other types Thomas Lockhart
05:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
05:50 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Oleg Bartunov
05:54 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
06:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
10:28 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Vince Vielhaber
11:07 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
11:22 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
11:25 Problem with query length Natalya S. Makushina
11:28 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
11:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
11:32 Query string lengths Ansley, Michael
12:01 Problem with query length Natalya S. Makushina
12:20 Problem with query length Natalya S. Makushina
12:23 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Tom Lane
12:45 Re: [HACKERS] Query string lengths Tom Lane
12:45 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
12:53 RE: [HACKERS] Problem with query length Ansley, Michael
12:55 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Tom Lane
13:09 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Tom Lane
13:20 RE: Patches Ansley, Michael
13:27 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
13:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
13:42 Re: [HACKERS] Query string lengths Thomas Lockhart
13:43 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
13:44 Re: [HACKERS] Query string lengths Bruce Momjian
13:46 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Bruce Momjian
14:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
14:06 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Bruce Momjian
14:35 RE: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow John Ridout
14:47 RE: [SQL] datediff function John Ridout
14:58 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
15:31 Drop user problem and DENY command Ricardo Coelho
16:08 Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Cary O'Brien
16:32 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Tom Lane
16:33 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Bruce Momjian
16:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
16:49 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
16:53 Drop group problem and DENY command Ricardo Coelho
17:39 Re: [GENERAL] Large database Bruce Momjian
17:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
17:42 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
18:22 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
19:02 [HaruspeX] New site - Version 4.0 Released Keith Parks
19:31 Re: [HACKERS] [HaruspeX] New site - Version 4.0 Released The Hermit Hacker
19:33 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Large database Tom Lane
19:34 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Tom Lane
19:37 Re: [HACKERS] [HaruspeX] New site - Version 4.0 Released Bruce Momjian
20:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
20:33 "out of free buffers: time to abort" message? Tom Lane
21:00 Re: [HACKERS] "out of free buffers: time to abort" message? Bruce Momjian
21:24 getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime jim@reptiles.org (Jim Mercer)
22:25 Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime Ross J. Reedstrom
22:44 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Hiroshi Inoue

18 August 1999

00:38 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
00:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
00:48 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
00:49 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
01:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Stephen Kogge
01:38 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
01:46 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
02:32 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
05:36 Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime Thomas Lockhart
06:59 RE: [HACKERS] Problem with query length Ansley, Michael
07:23 [Q] pg_dump with large object & backend cache... C.S.Park
07:45 vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii
08:32 Architecture Ansley, Michael
09:04 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
10:47 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
11:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
12:34 Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime jim@reptiles.org (Jim Mercer)
13:00 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Tom Lane
13:04 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
13:30 Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime Tom Lane
13:59 Re: [HACKERS] Architecture Tom Lane
14:16 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
17:12 [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Jackson, DeJuan
19:11 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Lamar Owen
20:01 Re: [HACKERS] [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Tom Lane
20:21 Re: [HACKERS] [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Egon Schmid
20:47 Re: [HACKERS] [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Michael Alan Dorman
22:00 RE: [HACKERS] [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Jackson, DeJuan
22:26 RE: [HACKERS] [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Vince Vielhaber

19 August 1999

11:12 RE: [HACKERS] [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Dmitry Samersoff
11:12 [HACKERS] Problem with query length Natalya S. Makushina
11:12 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii
11:12 RE: [HACKERS] Problem with query length Ansley, Michael
11:13 Survey Ansley, Michael
12:25 Mail list attachments Tom Lane
13:52 Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker
14:13 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Jeff Hoffmann
14:23 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Lamar Owen
14:25 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker
14:28 RE: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Jackson, DeJuan
14:32 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker
14:35 RE: [HACKERS] [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Jackson, DeJuan
14:40 RE: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker
14:49 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Vince Vielhaber
15:14 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Lamar Owen
15:21 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker
18:13 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Vince Vielhaber
20:18 Postgres' lexer Leon
20:41 ... Hub.Org News Admin
21:02 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
23:40 RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Hiroshi Inoue

20 August 1999

04:09 Re: Bug#43221: postgresql: When disk is full, insert corrupts indices Oliver Elphick
04:38 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bug#43221: postgresql: When disk is full, insert corrupts indices Vadim Mikheev
06:30 pg_log >> groving to infinity in 6.5.1 Richard Bouska
07:08 auth 30105652 subscribe pgsql-hackers xbouska@bsdi.infima.cz Richard Bouska
07:22 pg_log >> groving to infinity in 6.5.1 Richard Bouska
08:00 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
08:07 RE: [HACKERS] Problem with query length Ansley, Michael
08:23 Statement Triggers Patch F.J. Cuberos
08:31 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
08:42 RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Mike Mascari
09:10 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon
09:36 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
09:41 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
09:43 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
12:20 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
12:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bug#43221: postgresql: When disk is full, insert corrupts indices Tom Lane
12:35 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon
13:07 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
13:39 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
13:57 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Brook Milligan
15:21 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane
15:34 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane
15:38 What does it mean? Dmitry Samersoff
17:31 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon
20:16 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon

21 August 1999

01:16 sorting by << correct for rtrees? Tom Lane
01:55 ... Hub.Org News Admin
03:02 Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Tom Lane
05:34 Re: [HACKERS] Inefficiencies in COPY command Wayne Piekarski
07:22 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael

22 August 1999

02:30 Re: [HACKERS] pg_log >> growing to infinity in 6.5.1 Theo Kramer
04:33 Re: [HACKERS] pg_log >> growing to infinity in 6.5.1 Theo Kramer
17:48 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Adam Haberlach
18:59 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker

23 August 1999

10:16 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bug#43221: postgresql: When disk is full, insert corrupts indices Vadim Mikheev
11:08 trigger: run in transaction Zakkr
12:08 ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 José Soares
12:53 Array-fields and many-to-many relations Alke
12:54 OID and PL/pgSQL trigger :-( Alke
13:04 Re: [HACKERS] RE: [SQL] datediff function José Soares
13:22 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 Tom Lane
13:24 Re: [HACKERS] Array-fields and many-to-many relations Tom Lane
13:46 ... Hub.Org News Admin
14:20 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 José Soares
14:32 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 Tom Lane
21:46 Attempt to crack ftp site Daniele Orlandi
22:21 Re: [MIRRORS] Attempt to crack ftp site The Hermit Hacker
22:56 RE: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Hiroshi Inoue

24 August 1999

00:19 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii
03:01 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Bruce Momjian
03:02 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Bruce Momjian
03:31 Re: [HACKERS] Inefficiencies in COPY command Bruce Momjian
04:21 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker
05:02 ... Hub.Org News Admin
07:25 Lex and things... Ansley, Michael
08:48 AW: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
09:36 RE: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Hiroshi Inoue
09:37 Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon
10:00 RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael
10:19 RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael
11:29 Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon
11:29 Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon
12:17 RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael
12:36 Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Adriaan Joubert
13:13 Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon
13:13 Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon
13:59 Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Tom Lane
14:08 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
14:35 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Theo Kramer
15:21 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
16:01 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Brian E Gallew
17:59 Re: [HACKERS] Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Hannu Krosing
18:18 ... Hub.Org News Admin
19:22 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
19:37 Re: memory requirements question Tom Lane
19:52 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
20:15 Re: [HACKERS] Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Tom Lane
23:08 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii
23:15 RE: [HACKERS] Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Hiroshi Inoue
23:25 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Bruce Momjian

25 August 1999

00:09 RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Hiroshi Inoue
05:36 pg_log 100MB per day !!! on 5MB of data Richard Bouska
06:50 RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael
07:00 RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael
10:24 PATCH for Statement Triggers Support F.J. Cuberos
12:47 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
12:58 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii
13:01 RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Ansley, Michael
13:07 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size The Hermit Hacker
13:20 RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size The Hermit Hacker
13:23 RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Ansley, Michael
13:34 AW: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
13:34 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
13:57 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size The Hermit Hacker
14:05 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
15:42 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Leon
16:41 stuck spinlock Lori Allen
21:48 out of memory errors Clayton Cottingham

26 August 1999

15:43 Files ... Dmitry Samersoff
17:40 PG FAQ in PDF format Bruce Momjian

27 August 1999

11:39 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 José Soares
12:59 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 Tom Lane
13:46 Performance of MIN() and MAX() Gene Sokolov
14:31 Re: [HACKERS] Performance of MIN() and MAX() Tom Lane
18:07 Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime Tom Lane
18:12 Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime jim@reptiles.org (Jim Mercer)

28 August 1999

19:24 [Fwd: bug ? get_groname: group 0 not found] Spirou
20:20 Quoting in stored procedures Jochen Topf
20:27 Quoting in stored procedures pgsql-hackers@mail.remote.org
23:41 entries in pg_shadow Michael Richards
23:52 Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: bug ? get_groname: group 0 not found] Tom Lane
23:55 Re: [HACKERS] Quoting in stored procedures Tom Lane

29 August 1999

00:06 Re: [HACKERS] entries in pg_shadow Tom Lane
06:30 Cluster on (index-name) loose NOT NULL properties Constantin Teodorescu
11:47 ANSI SQL compliance Jernej Zajc
11:52 PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tatsuo Ishii
14:36 ... Hub.Org News Admin
15:50 Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Tom Lane
15:51 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane
16:49 Why not sub-selects in targetlists? Tom Lane
18:40 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker
19:20 Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Hannu Krosing

30 August 1999

00:40 Re: [HACKERS] Why not sub-selects in targetlists? Vadim Mikheev
01:03 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tatsuo Ishii
01:12 ... Hub.Org News Admin
05:27 Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Jernej Zajc
05:44 An optimisation question Constantin Teodorescu
08:26 ... Hub.Org News Admin
09:00 AW: [HACKERS] [Fwd: bug ? get_groname: group 0 not found] Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
11:16 IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current trees Horak Daniel
12:23 Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime José Soares
13:35 Re: [HACKERS] An optimisation question Tom Lane
14:05 Re: [HACKERS] Why not sub-selects in targetlists? Tom Lane
14:13 ... Hub.Org News Admin
14:34 Re: [HACKERS] An optimisation question Constantin Teodorescu
16:06 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker
16:54 Re: HELP Re: pg_group, etc.. Ricardo Coelho
16:55 bouncefilter added to majordomo lists ... The Hermit Hacker
16:56 ... Hub.Org News Admin
17:15 ... Hub.Org News Admin
19:54 Re: [HACKERS] Quoting in stored procedures pgsql-hackers@mail.remote.org
20:20 Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Oliver Elphick
20:21 ... Hub.Org News Admin
20:51 ... Hub.Org News Admin
21:03 File descriptor leakage? Cyrus Rahman
21:05 ... Hub.Org News Admin
23:03 File descriptor leakage? Cyrus Rahman
23:38 ... Hub.Org News Admin

31 August 1999

00:51 Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Tom Lane
00:54 Re: libpq drops error messages received just before backend crash Tom Lane
03:11 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Thomas Lockhart
03:46 RE: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Hiroshi Inoue
04:11 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/parser (parse_node.h parse_oper.h) Thomas Lockhart
05:48 Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Thomas Lockhart
06:05 Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Thomas Lockhart
07:31 Re: IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current trees yutaka tanida
07:37 Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Oleg Broytmann
08:31 Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Tatsuo Ishii
11:14 Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Oleg Bartunov
11:14 optimizer pruning problem Roberto Cornacchia
12:38 Re: [HACKERS] optimizer pruning problem Tom Lane
12:48 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/parser (parse_node.h parse_oper.h) Tom Lane
12:53 Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Tom Lane
13:01 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane
13:09 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
13:20 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane
13:22 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
14:13 Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Cyrus Rahman
14:24 Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? The Hermit Hacker
14:24 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Thomas Lockhart
14:51 Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Tom Lane
15:23 Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Vadim Mikheev
15:41 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Massimo Dal Zotto
15:41 bug in array contrib Massimo Dal Zotto
15:51 ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina
16:53 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane
17:13 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon
17:28 ... fjcuberos@rtva.es
17:34 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog Tom Lane
18:04 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina
18:51 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker
18:53 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog Tom Lane
19:10 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina
19:50 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Massimo Dal Zotto
19:50 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Massimo Dal Zotto
20:49 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog Tom Lane
20:52 CVS Broken? Keith Parks
20:54 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane
21:07 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina
21:19 OID 718 and Circle G. Anthony Reina
21:57 Re: CVS Broken? The Hermit Hacker