Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Leon
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer
Date
Msg-id 37BDC497.F4ADE095@udmnet.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> "Ansley, Michael" <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za> writes:
> > Sorry, Tom, I saw the tgl initals, and assumed it was you, before realising
> > that there are a couple of people who could be identified by those initials.
> 
> All of those are Lockhart.  I recall having done something with the
> string-constant lexing, but I have no idea what this <xm> is all about.

BTW, one more stu-u-u-upid question: why unary minus needs high 
precedence? Seems that all works well without any specified
precedence for uminus ;)  - it is only a remark.

-- 
Leon.
---------
"This may seem a bit weird, but that's okay, because it is weird." -
Perl manpage.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Leon
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: sorting by << correct for rtrees?