Re: [HACKERS] Mega-commits to "stable" version - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Mega-commits to "stable" version
Date
Msg-id 37A7377F.806A89A2@trust.ee
Whole thread Raw
In response to Mega-commits to "stable" version  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Mega-commits to "stable" version
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> 
> > Is anyone else disturbed by wholesale changes to what is supposed to
> > be a stable release?
> > I am sure Marc will say these are low-risk changes --- but they're not
> > *no* risk, because there is always a chance of propagating part of
> > some other change that you didn't want, or failing to propagate all
> > of the change you did want.  And how much testing will the modified
> > 6.5.x code get before it gets published as a stable version?

Maybe we should do a 6.5.2beta before the real 6.5.2 so that people are 
warned and know what to expect? 

------------
Hannu


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded
Next
From: "G. Anthony Reina"
Date:
Subject: Backup database with entries > 8192 KBytes