Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size
Date
Msg-id 5918.935588770@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size
List pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> Just for a confirmation: I see REL6_5_PATCHES and REL6_5 Tag in the
> CVS respository. I thought that REL6_5_PATCHES is the Tag for the 6.5
> statble tree and would eventually become 6.5.2. If so, what is the
> REL6_5 Tag? Or I totally miss the point?

Right, REL6_5_PATCHES is the 6.5.* branch.  REL6_5 is just a tag ---
that is, it's effectively a frozen snapshot of the 6.5 release,
not an evolvable branch.

I am not sure if Marc intends to continue this naming convention
in future, or if it was just a mistake to create REL6_5 as a tag
not a branch.  I don't see a whole lot of use for the frozen tag
myself...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "F.J. Cuberos"
Date:
Subject: PATCH for Statement Triggers Support
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size