Re: [HACKERS] Long table names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Long table names
Date
Msg-id 2875.934838190@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Long table names  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu> writes:
> As you can see, the table name has been truncated to make the whole
> thing fit into 32 characters. You'd need to check the source to see the
> exact algorithm: I'm not sure if it starts trimming on the field name,
> ever.

Right now, the algorithm is to preferentially truncate the longer name
component (table name or column name).  There was some talk of adding
quasi-random hash characters to reduce the probability of name
collisions, but it's not been done.

Anyway, to answer the question Finn asked,

>> I remember someone talking about compiling pgsql so that it could use 
>> table names longer than 32 bytes, but that it would require some 
>> changes in the source code. Could anyone tell me what changes these 
>> are,

In theory you should only have to change NAMEDATALEN, rebuild, and
initdb.  I think someone reported a few months on actually trying
this experiment (probably, around the same time we decided to put in
the name-truncation logic); check the pghackers archives for details.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] README.locale patch 2
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail