Re: [HACKERS] COPY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Theo Kramer
Subject Re: [HACKERS] COPY
Date
Msg-id 37B4399E.5C62183B@flame.co.za
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] COPY  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> I can think of situations where you'd want it either way.  (For example,
> in a pg_dump restore script I'd sure want big red warning flags if there
> were any problems, not a piddly little message in the postmaster log...)
> 
> How about creating a SET variable that chooses either the above behavior
> or the existing one?
> 
> If that seems acceptable all 'round, we can start arguing about which
> way ought to be the default ;-)

Sounds good to me. I'll start looking at whats involved.
--------
Regards
Theo


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: We won!
Next
From: Theo Kramer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Index scan?