Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.10.9908152359310.401-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> > manage to have the same man page name as some other existing page.
> > *That* would be a bad thing. And in general adding ~75 man pages to
> > existing sections is a pretty big load...
> 
> As long as we install into /usr/local/pgsql/man/man*, naming conflicts
> with other packages aren't too big a deal --- there's no physical file
> conflict, and people can just add or remove /usr/local/pgsql/man/ in
> their MANPATH settings to see or not see Postgres manpages.

Jumping in mid-stream and a week late (love holidays, eh? *grin*) ... My
opinion is to make the default ${PREFIX}/man and have a --manpath=
variable set to configure to move it to a different place...

I *believe* that Oracle installs its man pages under its install
directory, but can't confirm right now...

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages