Re: [HACKERS] Threads - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dmitry Samersoff
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Threads
Date
Msg-id XFMail.990803183757.dms@wplus.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Threads  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 03-Aug-99 Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>> As well, a few have been asking about multi-threading.
>> Any thoughts?

I completly agree with Thomas.

Mutiprocess server is also more convenient 
for managing and more portable 


> 
> Threads within a client backend might be interesting. imho a
> single-process multi-client multi-threaded server is just asking for
> trouble, putting all clients at risk for any single misbehaving one.
> Particularly with our extensibility features, where users and admins
> can add functionality through code they have written (or are trying to
> write ;) having each backend isolated is A Good Thing.
> 
> istm that many of the cases for which multi-threading is proposed (web
> serving always comes up) can be solved using persistant connections or
> other techniques.
> 
>                      - Thomas
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Lockhart                               lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
> South Pasadena, California

---
Dmitry Samersoff, dms@wplus.net, ICQ:3161705
http://devnull.wplus.net
* There will come soft rains ...


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Ansley, Michael"
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Threads
Next
From: Duane Currie
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Threads