Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

18 November 2003

• 00:01   Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier
• 00:01   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Mike Mascari
• 00:09   Re: Release cycle length Neil Conway
• 00:12   Re: Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut
• 00:21   Re: logical column position Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:22   Re: Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut
• 00:36   help! Larry Rosenman
• 00:39   Re: logical column position Bruce Momjian
• 00:40   Re: logical column position Bruce Momjian
• 00:43   Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:45   Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:53   Re: help! Larry Rosenman
• 00:57   Re: help! Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:58   Re: Release cycle length Joshua D. Drake
• 01:02   Re: help! Larry Rosenman
• 01:25   Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier
• 01:27   Re: Release cycle length Doug McNaught
• 01:30   Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:33   Re: Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut
• 01:34   Re: Release cycle length Neil Conway
• 01:36   Re: libpq thread safety Bruce Momjian
• 01:45   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Bruce Momjian
• 01:49   Re: logical column position Rod Taylor
• 01:53   Re: Release cycle length Matthew T. O'Connor
• 02:06   Re: logical column position Peter Eisentraut
• 02:07   Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier
• 02:13   Re: logical column position Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:19   Re: Release cycle length Neil Conway
• 02:24   Re: logical column position Stephan Szabo
• 02:32   Re: Release cycle length Kevin Brown
• 02:40   Re: Release cycle length Kevin Brown
• 02:42   Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:57   Re: Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut
• 03:04   Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier
• 03:08   Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:18   Re: Release cycle length Larry Rosenman
• 03:39   Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier
• 03:39   Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier
• 03:44   So as not to break it for anyone ... Marc G. Fournier
• 04:21   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Greg Stark
• 04:33   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:53   Re: Release cycle length Neil Conway
• 04:54   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Matthew T. O'Connor
• 05:04   Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier
• 05:04   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Peter Eisentraut
• 05:14   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Greg Stark
• 05:19   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dann Corbit
• 05:34   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Peter Eisentraut
• 05:39   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? ow
• 05:40   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dann Corbit
• 05:42   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan
• 05:52   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dann Corbit
• 05:56   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan
• 06:00   Re: Background writer process Shridhar Daithankar
• 06:35   Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*)) Tom Lane
• 07:23   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dave Page
• 08:15   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Peter Eisentraut
• 08:21   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Christoph Haller
• 08:22   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Peter Eisentraut
• 08:41   Re: Background writer process Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 08:46   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dave Page
• 09:03   Re: Release cycle length Oliver Elphick
• 09:42   Re: Release cycle length Sean Chittenden
• 10:35   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Shachar Shemesh
• 10:53   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Shachar Shemesh
• 11:03   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Marek Lewczuk
• 11:27   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Claudio Natoli
• 11:55   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan
• 12:00   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Marek Lewczuk
• 12:20   Re: Release cycle length Bruno Wolff III
• 12:32   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Claudio Natoli
• 12:32   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Jean-Michel POURE
• 12:34   Re: Release cycle length Tommi Maekitalo
• 12:41   Re: logical column position Dave Cramer
• 12:45   Re: Release cycle length Alvaro Herrera
• 13:35   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Claudio Natoli
• 13:44   Re: logical column position Bruce Momjian
• 13:44   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Marek Lewczuk
• 13:51   Re: Release cycle length Bruce Momjian
• 14:02   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Bruce Momjian
• 14:11   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Claudio Natoli
• 14:19   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Bruce Momjian
• 14:54   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan
• 15:06   Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the near future??? Christoper Smiga
• 15:40   Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Marc G. Fournier
• 15:40   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? ow
• 15:54   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Rocco Altier
• 16:15   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan
• 16:18   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? ow
• 16:20   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Sullivan
• 16:21   Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the near future??? Christopher Browne
• 16:25   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Josh Berkus
• 16:27   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Win32 Port WAS: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Josh Berkus
• 16:34   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Win32 Port WAS: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Sullivan
• 16:42   Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the near future??? Andrew Rawnsley
• 16:43   Re: [pgsql-www] Release cycle length Josh Berkus
• 17:07   Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Sailesh Krishnamurthy
• 17:18   Re: [pgsql-www] Release cycle length Alvaro Herrera
• 17:20   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Christopher Browne
• 17:49   Re: [pgsql-www] Release cycle length Andrew Dunstan
• 17:59   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dann Corbit
• 18:16   Re: [pgsql-www] Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier
• 18:23   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? ow
• 18:32   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dann Corbit
• 18:34   Sponsoring enterprise features James Rogers
• 18:36   Build farm Andrew Dunstan
• 18:48   Re: Sponsoring enterprise features Josh Berkus
• 18:58   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Bruce Momjian
• 19:16   Re: start of transaction Shridhar Daithankar
• 19:17   Re: 4 Clause license? Simon L. Nielsen
• 19:18   Re: Release cycle length elein
• 19:22   Re: Background writer process Shridhar Daithankar
• 19:25   Re: Need help. Petro Pelekh
• 19:33   Re: [CORE] 7.4RC2 regression failur and not running Derek Morr
• 19:39   Re: Sponsoring enterprise features Rod Taylor
• 19:46   calling plpgsql from c Max Jacob
• 20:29   Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Robert Treat
• 20:51   Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Mike Mascari
• 21:12   Re: Build farm Robert Treat
• 21:22   Commercial binary support? Austin Gonyou
• 21:31   Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Sailesh Krishnamurthy
• 23:52   Comment on pg_catalog and information_schema objects Tom Hebbron