Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date
Msg-id 3FBA40A0.60108@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I am ready to work with anyone to make fork/exec happen. It requires we
>
>find out what globals are being set by the postmaster, and have the
>child run those same routines.  I can show you examples of what I have
>done and walk you through areas that need work.  If you look at the
>EXEC_BACKEND defines in CVS, you can see what I have done so far.  We
>need to have EXEC_BACKEND working on Unix first, then we can add the
>CreateProcess call on Win32, so all this can be done on Unix first.
>  
>

How is EXEC_BACKEND going to be enabled? A configure option? A global 
define?

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Next
From: Christoper Smiga
Date:
Subject: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the near future???