Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date
Msg-id 200311181958.hAIJwGr06615@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > I am ready to work with anyone to make fork/exec happen. It requires we
> >
> >find out what globals are being set by the postmaster, and have the
> >child run those same routines.  I can show you examples of what I have
> >done and walk you through areas that need work.  If you look at the
> >EXEC_BACKEND defines in CVS, you can see what I have done so far.  We
> >need to have EXEC_BACKEND working on Unix first, then we can add the
> >CreateProcess call on Win32, so all this can be done on Unix first.
> >  
> >
> 
> How is EXEC_BACKEND going to be enabled? A configure option? A global 
> define?

We will use it for testing to make sure Unix can work with exec(), then
we add CreateProcess and make EXEC_BACKEND defined for that platform.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Sponsoring enterprise features
Next
From: Shridhar Daithankar
Date:
Subject: Re: start of transaction