Uz.ytkownik Andrew Dunstan napisa?:
>
>
> Claudio Natoli wrote:
> As for release numbering, ISTM that is not fundamentally very important.
> At my former company we had code names for branches and decided release
> names/numbers near release time in accordance with marketing
> requirements. Let's not get hung up on nominalism. A release number is
> just a tag and we can call it whatever seems good at the time.
Maybe it's a good time to think about PostgreSQL's marketing strategy &
identity. Maybe this great DBMS should be changed in all areas - not
only in technical related fields ?
ML
