Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dann Corbit
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date
Msg-id D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B8294CE395@voyager.corporate.connx.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:04 PM
> To: Matthew T. O'Connor
> Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne; Greg Stark; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
>
>
> Matthew T. O'Connor writes:
>
> > Absolutely!  In addition, even if you don't consider win32
> a platform
> > to run production databases on, the win32 port will help developers
> > who work from windows boxes, which is the certainly the most widely
> > used desktop environment.
>
> At the risk of stating the obvious: Cygwin is your friend in
> exactly this case.

Yes, but how friendly is it?

Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?