Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> > Here's the situation as I see it:
> > . there have been lots of requests for a native Win32 port
> > . this is important to some people and not important to others
> > . the decision has long ago been made to do it, and some work
> > has been done, and more is being done
> >
> > Isn't it time to move on?
>
> No arguments here. As soon as the fork/exec changes are in place, count me
> in!
It doesn't matter really --- I am working on the win32 port, and will
make sure it is done and I will make sure it is done so it doesn't
uglify our code.
> Speaking of which, any ETA on this? Bruce? If anyone from core can indicate
> how they'd like this architected (from the perspective of code
> rearrangement), I'm willing to have a crack at this.
http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/win32.html
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
