Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date
Msg-id 3FB9C292.6050106@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
By the (non-existant) powers vested in me I hereby designate this as 
"rehash old and fruitless arguments" week.

cheers

andrew

Dann Corbit wrote:

>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] 
>>Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:34 PM
>>To: Dann Corbit
>>Cc: Matthew T. O'Connor; Christopher Kings-Lynne; Greg Stark; 
>>PostgreSQL Development
>>Subject: RE: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
>>
>>
>>Dann Corbit writes:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>>At the risk of stating the obvious: Cygwin is your friend 
>>>>        
>>>>
>>in exactly 
>>    
>>
>>>>this case.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Yes, but how friendly is it?
>>>      
>>>
>>What are you asking here?  Is it easy to install and use?  Yes.
>>    
>>
>
>You brought it up.
>
>  
>
>>>Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
>>>      
>>>
>>No, it does not.
>>    
>>
>
>Really?
>
>What's this then?
>http://www.cygwin.com/licensing.html
>http://www.redhat.com/software/cygwin/
>
>
>  
>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dann Corbit"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Next
From: Shridhar Daithankar
Date:
Subject: Re: Background writer process