Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date
Msg-id 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B871FFFE@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net]
> Sent: 17 November 2003 23:31
> To: Josh Berkus
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
>
> Josh Berkus writes:
>
> > Given all that, don't people think it's time to jump to 8.0?
>
> As has been said before, many people think that a Windows
> port is the least interesting feature ever to happen to
> PostgreSQL, so you're going to have to come up with better
> reasons.

Least interesting to many user perhaps, but lost of them seen to think
that it's important for expanding our userbase:
http://www.postgresql.org/survey.php?View=1&SurveyID=9

That can't be a bad thing.

Regards, Dave.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*))
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?