Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

23 September 2015

• 00:17   Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Alvaro Herrera
• 00:44   Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Tom Lane
• 00:57   Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Alvaro Herrera
• 01:03   Re: One question about security label command Joe Conway
• 01:17   Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements Jim Nasby
• 01:48   Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements David Rowley
• 01:58   Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements Peter Geoghegan
• 02:24   Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Andres Freund
• 02:27   Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements Jim Nasby
• 02:38   Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements Tom Lane
• 02:40   Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements Tom Lane
• 02:45   Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Andres Freund
• 03:01   Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements Peter Geoghegan
• 03:12   Re: Parallel Seq Scan Robert Haas
• 03:14   Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Robert Haas
• 03:23   Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Andres Freund
• 04:01   unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Peter Eisentraut
• 04:02   Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements Peter Geoghegan
• 04:13   Re: Parallel Seq Scan Kouhei Kaigai
• 04:14   Re: planstate_tree_walker oversight CustomScan Robert Haas
• 04:18   Re: Parallel Seq Scan Amit Kapila
• 04:22   Re: Parallel Seq Scan Robert Haas
• 04:27   Re: Parallel Seq Scan Robert Haas
• 04:30   Re: planstate_tree_walker oversight CustomScan Kouhei Kaigai
• 04:34   Re: a funnel by any other name Robert Haas
• 04:43   Re: planstate_tree_walker oversight CustomScan Robert Haas
• 04:56   Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements Alvaro Herrera
• 04:57   Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements Peter Geoghegan
• 05:15   Re: a funnel by any other name Alvaro Herrera
• 05:29   Re: Parallel Seq Scan Kouhei Kaigai
• 05:36   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Charles Clavadetscher
• 07:11   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Amir Rohan
• 08:11   Re: PATCH: use foreign keys to improve join estimates v1 David Rowley
• 09:24   Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Shulgin, Oleksandr
• 09:28   Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Shulgin, Oleksandr
• 10:12   Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING Zhaomo Yang
• 10:22   Re: Parallel Seq Scan Amit Kapila
• 12:40   Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Shulgin, Oleksandr
• 12:57   Inconsistency in Output function of MergeJoin Amit Kapila
• 13:22   Re: Parallel Seq Scan Amit Kapila
• 15:10   Re: 9.5: Can't connect with PGSSLMODE=require on Windows Michael Paquier
• 16:18   Re: TEXT vs VARCHAR join qual push down diffrence, bug or expected? Jeevan Chalke
• 16:21   Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Tom Lane
• 16:29   Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Alvaro Herrera
• 16:34   Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Alvaro Herrera
• 16:36   Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Andres Freund
• 16:40   Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Shulgin, Oleksandr
• 16:57   Re: a funnel by any other name Simon Riggs
• 16:59   Re: a funnel by any other name Simon Riggs
• 16:59   Re: TEXT vs VARCHAR join qual push down diffrence, bug or expected? Tom Lane
• 17:27   Re: TEXT vs VARCHAR join qual push down diffrence, bug or expected? Tom Lane
• 17:44   Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs Robert Haas
• 17:48   Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches Robert Haas
• 17:53   Re: Inconsistency in Output function of MergeJoin Robert Haas
• 17:59   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Robert Haas
• 18:05   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Stephen Frost
• 18:11   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Robert Haas
• 18:23   Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches Alvaro Herrera
• 18:24   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Stephen Frost
• 18:46   Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches Robert Haas
• 18:49   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Robert Haas
• 18:53   Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING Stephen Frost
• 19:00   Re: Parallel Seq Scan Robert Haas
• 19:01   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Stephen Frost
• 19:17   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Robert Haas
• 19:26   Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs Peter Eisentraut
• 19:37   Re: Parallel Seq Scan Robert Haas
• 19:37   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Peter Eisentraut
• 19:45   Re: TEXT vs VARCHAR join qual push down diffrence, bug or expected? Tom Lane
• 19:46   Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs Robert Haas
• 20:53   Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING Zhaomo Yang
• 21:03   Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Alvaro Herrera
• 21:05   Postgres - BDR issue Rahul Goel
• 21:19   No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Kam Lasater
• 21:23   Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Alvaro Herrera
• 21:30   Re: Parallel Seq Scan Robert Haas
• 21:30   Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Kam Lasater
• 21:33   Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Stephen Frost
• 21:40   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Stephen Frost
• 21:43   Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Robert Haas
• 21:45   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Robert Haas
• 21:49   Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Andres Freund
• 21:52   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Stephen Frost
• 21:54   Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING Stephen Frost
• 21:58   Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Alvaro Herrera
• 22:00   Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Andres Freund
• 22:07   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Alvaro Herrera
• 22:20   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Stephen Frost
• 22:22   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Peter Eisentraut
• 22:39   clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Robert Haas
• 22:41   Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Stephen Frost
• 22:47   Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Joshua D. Drake
• 22:47   Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Joshua D. Drake
• 22:55   Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Josh Berkus
• 23:04   Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Josh Berkus
• 23:07   Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Stephen Frost
• 23:12   Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Thomas Kellerer
• 23:29   Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Alvaro Herrera
• 23:31   Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Tom Lane
• 23:41   Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements Jim Nasby
• 23:43   Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements Jim Nasby
• 23:58   Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Kam Lasater