Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work
Date
Msg-id 20150923133630.GJ1573@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-09-23 10:29:09 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >  /*
> > + * Delete an individual SLRU segment, identified by the segment number.
> > + */
> > +void
> > +SlruDeleteSegment(SlruCtl ctl, int segno)
> 
> Is it okay to change the ABI of SlruDeleteSegment?

I think so. Any previous user of the API is going to be currently broken
anyway due to the missing flushing of buffers.

Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing
Next
From: "Shulgin, Oleksandr"
Date:
Subject: Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing