Re: Parallel Seq Scan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaRzBq0-SwvmpXB8Kq_Q_aAJCF9Ng+YF7Bd_OeXtgtoKg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel Seq Scan  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Instead of passing the Plan down by casting, how about passing
>> &local_node->plan?  And similarly for scans and joins.
> Changed as per suggestion.

The point of this change was to make it so that we wouldn't need the
casts any more.  You changed it so we didn't, but then didn't actually
get rid of them.  I did that, tweaked a comment, and committed this.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK