On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
>> Gosh, I think it would have been better to have a cleaner separation
>> of USING and WITH CHECK. That sounds far too unnecessarily magical.
>
> That the USING policy is used if WITH CHECK isn't defined? That was
> simply done to make policy management simple as in quite a few cases
> only one policy is needed. If a WITH CHECK was always required then
> you'd be constantly writing:
>
> CREATE POLICY p1 ON t1
> USING (entered_by = current_user)
> WITH CHECK (entered_by = current_user);
>
> With potentially quite lengthy expressions.
>
> I'm not against changing that if people feel strongly about it, but I
> certainly find it extremely handy.
>
> If that wasn't what you were referring to then please clarify as I
> didn't follow.
No, that's what I was talking about. Maybe it is the most useful
behavior, but it seems to have surprised Peter, and it surprised me,
too.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
