Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > For 1, Gather makes most sense.
>
> Yeah, I'm leaning that way myself. Amit argued for "Parallel Gather"
> but I think that's overkill. There can't be a non-parallel gather,
> and long names are a pain.
"Gather" seems a pretty decent choice to me too, even if we only have a
single worker (your "1"). I don't think there's much need to
distinguish 1 from 2, is there?
We can bikeshed the other names when the time comes; the insight in the
thread is good to have.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
