Re: planstate_tree_walker oversight CustomScan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: planstate_tree_walker oversight CustomScan
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYWpSKrSa=Wm6vtRi6qphg1gNjqwp9kpano18OZZfHuow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to planstate_tree_walker oversight CustomScan  (Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Responses Re: planstate_tree_walker oversight CustomScan  (Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> The planstate_tree_walker() oversight custom_ps of CustomScanState;
> that should be a list of underlying PlanState object if any.
>
> ExplainPreScanNode() treated ForeignScan and CustomScan in special
> way (it is sufficient for ExplainPreScanNode() purpose), thus, it
> didn't implement its recursive portion originally.
>
> The job of ExplainPreScanNode() is know all the relids involved
> in a particular subquery execution. On the other hands, fs_relids
> of ForeignScan and custom_relids of CustomScan informs a set of
> relids to be scanned by this Scan node without recursive, so it
> did not have recursive walks on the underlying sub-plans.
>
> However, planstate_tree_walker() will have different expectation.
> It is general walker routine, thus, it is natural users to expect
> the callback is also kicked towards the underlying planstate of
> CustomScan (and ForeignScan; once EPQ recheck gets solved).
>
> The attached patch adds support of CustomScan on the walker.

Do you need to add something to ExplainPreScanNode for this as well,
like if (scanrelid != 0) *rels_used = bms_add_member(*rels_used,
scanrelid)?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kouhei Kaigai
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan