Mailing lists [pgsql-advocacy]

1 May 2005

• 01:34   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Robert Treat
• 01:40   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Robert Treat
• 02:00   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Robert Treat
• 23:59   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier

2 May 2005

• 00:02   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 16:48   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Josh Berkus
• 16:53   Pervasive Postgres + SuSE Josh Berkus
• 17:14   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 17:17   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 17:23   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 17:28   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 17:33   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 17:39   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Dave Held
• 17:47   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 17:48   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 17:54   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Dave Held
• 17:56   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 17:57   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 17:59   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 18:12   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 18:14   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 18:16   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Josh Berkus
• 18:35   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased Marc G. Fournier
• 18:40   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased Joshua D. Drake
• 18:44   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Dave Held
• 18:44   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Josh Berkus
• 18:50   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Tom Lane
• 19:08   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Josh Berkus
• 19:21   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Chris Travers
• 19:23   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Bruce Momjian
• 19:28   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Robert Treat
• 19:57   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Bruce Momjian
• 20:12   Re: Pervasive Postgres + SuSE Lance Obermeyer
• 20:34   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Bruce Momjian
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Dave Held
• 21:39   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Alvaro Herrera
• 21:56   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Dave Held

3 May 2005

• 00:02   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Robert Treat
• 02:22   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Dave Held
• 02:22   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Andrew Dunstan
• 02:22   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Jim C. Nasby
• 02:23   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 02:23   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Jim C. Nasby
• 02:23   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Jim C. Nasby
• 02:23   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Dann Corbit
• 02:23   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Jim C. Nasby
• 02:26   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Rob Butler
• 02:27   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Rosser Schwarz
• 02:27   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Nicolai Petri (lists)
• 02:27   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Rosser Schwarz
• 16:34   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Dave Held
• 17:37   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Pavel Stehule
• 17:38   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Andrew Dunstan
• 18:26   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Mitch Pirtle
• 18:34   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 18:40   [OT] Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Tom Copeland

4 May 2005

• 15:46   Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 18:21   Re: [OT] Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Mitch Pirtle
• 20:30   "Enterprise User" wanted Josh Berkus

5 May 2005

• 01:29   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Bruce Momjian
• 01:42   Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Bruce Momjian
• 23:47   Major contributors wanted for magazine interview Josh Berkus

7 May 2005

• 04:11   Re: [OT] Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Russell Smith

10 May 2005

• 08:23   PostgreSQLFr.org news Jean-Paul Argudo
• 16:53   Re: PostgreSQLFr.org news Josh Berkus

11 May 2005

• 19:00   Need presenters, sponsors for EuroOSCON Josh Berkus
• 19:25   Re: Need presenters, sponsors for EuroOSCON Bruce Momjian
• 19:34   Commercial support organisations in Hong Kong? Andrew Sullivan
• 19:37   Re: Commercial support organisations in Hong Kong? Josh Berkus
• 19:45   Re: Commercial support organisations in Hong Kong? Andrew Sullivan

12 May 2005

• 19:37   Need EuroOSCON lead Josh Berkus
• 19:48   Re: Need EuroOSCON lead Oleg Bartunov

13 May 2005

• 20:19   Re: Need EuroOSCON lead Mark Wong

16 May 2005

• 16:27   Re: Need EuroOSCON lead Josh Berkus
• 17:46   Re: Need EuroOSCON lead Oleg Bartunov

17 May 2005

• 14:44   about archives postgresql Jaime Casanova
• 15:23   Re: about archives postgresql Marc G. Fournier
• 20:23   Re: Need EuroOSCON lead Simon Riggs

18 May 2005

• 09:57   Re: Need EuroOSCON lead Jean-Paul Argudo
• 13:01   Re: Need EuroOSCON lead Robert Treat
• 14:17   Re: Need EuroOSCON lead Simon Riggs
• 17:12   Re: Need EuroOSCON lead Josh Berkus

19 May 2005

• 16:34   Postgres in government Mark Steckel
• 16:34   Re: [GENERAL] Postgres in government Scott Marlowe
• 16:59   Re: Postgres in government Josh Berkus
• 17:02   Re: Postgres in government Bryan Encina
• 17:07   Re: Postgres in government Joshua D. Drake
• 17:19   Re: Postgres in government Josh Berkus
• 17:21   Re: Postgres in government Robby Russell
• 17:25   Re: Postgres in government Robert Treat
• 17:30   Re: Postgres in government Joshua D. Drake
• 19:40   Re: Postgres in government Ron Mayer
• 19:59   Re: Postgres in government Joshua D. Drake
• 20:16   Re: Postgres in government David Fetter
• 20:18   Re: Postgres in government Robert Treat

20 May 2005

• 03:54   Re: Postgres in government Christopher Kings-Lynne

23 May 2005

• 21:05   Press looking for Oracle conversions Bruce Momjian
• 21:30   Re: Press looking for Oracle conversions Javier Soltero

24 May 2005

• 06:55   Re: Press looking for Oracle conversions Simon Riggs

27 May 2005

• 18:33   OSCON field trip, Friday afternoon Josh Berkus

30 May 2005

• 16:47   US Goverment and Patents Bruce Momjian
• 18:42   Re: US Goverment and Patents Robert Bernier
• 21:50   OSS rdbms evaluation documents Satoshi Nagayasu

31 May 2005

• 18:05   Major flood of mail to lists ... Marc G. Fournier
• 20:14   We are Spammed Vishal Kashyap @ [SaiHertz]
• 21:06   Re: We are Spammed Marc G. Fournier