[OT] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Copeland
Subject [OT] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Msg-id 1115145627.12270.5.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Increased company involvement  (Bruce Momjian)
Responses Re: [OT] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  (Russell Smith)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:26 -0400, Mitch Pirtle wrote:
> If you guys are planning on running Gforge, then you better make 'box' plural.
> I'm running MamboForge.net, and the poor thing is getting beat into
> the cold hard earth every day. We (Mambo) should really have two
> servers, at least to dedicate hardware to the database. Most of the
> servers in that class are dual Xeons as well - just as an indicator of
> what you are getting yourselves into ;-)

Of course, Mitch is running the second largest GForge site on the planet
(as far as I know).... second only to https://helixcommunity.org/.
Here's a list of them:



Tom Copeland

pgsql-hackers by date:

From: Dave Cramer
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1