Re: [OT] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Russell Smith
Subject Re: [OT] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date
Msg-id 200505041748.48213.mr-russ@pws.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to [OT] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  (Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com>)
Responses Re: [OT] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  (Mitch Pirtle <mitch.pirtle@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 4 May 2005 04:40 am, Tom Copeland wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:26 -0400, Mitch Pirtle wrote:
> > If you guys are planning on running Gforge, then you better make 'box' plural.
> >
> > I'm running MamboForge.net, and the poor thing is getting beat into
> > the cold hard earth every day. We (Mambo) should really have two
> > servers, at least to dedicate hardware to the database. Most of the
> > servers in that class are dual Xeons as well - just as an indicator of
> > what you are getting yourselves into ;-)
>
> Of course, Mitch is running the second largest GForge site on the planet
> (as far as I know).... second only to https://helixcommunity.org/.
> Here's a list of them:
>
> http://gforge.org/docman/view.php/1/52/gforge-sites.html
>
Where does all the CPU/disk time go?   Do we have any idea what are the strained parts of the system?

Is it the database?

Regards

Russell Smith.
> Yours,
>
> Tom Copeland
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>
>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Next
From: Kaare Rasmussen
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1