Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

3 May 2005

• 00:02   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Robert Treat
• 00:53   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 01:02   Re: SPI bug. Neil Conway
• 02:43   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Tom Lane
• 03:04   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Neil Conway
• 06:23   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Pavel Stehule
• 06:41   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Michael Paesold
• 06:45   BTW, if anyone wants to work on it... Tom Lane
• 07:35   Re: SPI bug. Thomas Hallgren
• 09:11   bitmap scan and explain analyze Tatsuo Ishii
• 09:46   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Dawid Kuroczko
• 09:57   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Hannu Krosing
• 09:57   Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only Hannu Krosing
• 10:10   Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only Hannu Krosing
• 10:12   Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only Hannu Krosing
• 10:46   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Peter Eisentraut
• 10:55   Re: BTW, if anyone wants to work on it... Magnus Hagander
• 13:00   Regression tests des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
• 13:38   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Stephen Frost
• 14:22   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Merlin Moncure
• 14:27   Re: Regression tests Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 14:31   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 14:37   Re: bitmap scan and explain analyze Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Tom Lane
• 14:59   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Dave Held
• 15:08   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 15:08   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 16:34   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Dave Held
• 16:36   distributed database mohammad izwan ibrahim
• 16:36   Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Markus Schaber
• 16:40   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Peter Eisentraut
• 16:47   Re: distributed database Peter Eisentraut
• 16:53   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:03   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Thomas Hallgren
• 17:08   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 17:10   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 17:11   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Robert Treat
• 17:12   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 17:14   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 17:14   A proper fix for the conversion-function problem Tom Lane
• 17:15   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 17:20   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 17:23   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 17:37   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Andrew Dunstan
• 17:39   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 17:46   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 17:52   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Tom Lane
• 18:00   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Robert Treat
• 18:02   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Dave Held
• 18:09   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 18:22   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 18:26   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 18:34   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 18:36   Bogus assertion in multixact.c? Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:36   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Stephen Frost
• 18:41   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 18:43   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Stephen Frost
• 18:44   Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c? Tom Lane
• 18:44   Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c? Alvaro Herrera
• 18:47   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Stephen Frost
• 18:48   Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c? Tom Lane
• 18:49   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 18:50   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Stephen Frost
• 18:50   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Peter Eisentraut
• 18:51   Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c? Alvaro Herrera
• 18:52   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 18:53   Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c? Tom Lane
• 18:54   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 18:54   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Stephen Frost
• 18:58   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 19:19   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Dave Cramer
• 19:21   Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c? Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:31   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Robert Treat
• 19:36   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 19:40   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 19:42   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Dave Cramer
• 20:01   [OT] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Tom Copeland
• 20:36   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 
• 20:58   Re: Regression tests des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
• 21:10   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Dave Held
• 21:20   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 21:33   Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Mischa Sandberg
• 21:33   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Thomas Swan
• 21:42   Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus
• 22:40   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Dave Held
• 22:50   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Doug McNaught
• 22:55   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Chuck McDevitt
• 22:59   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett
• 23:57   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 23:59   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier