Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date
Msg-id 4277B8DF.4000608@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

Robert Treat wrote:

>
>Is telling the rpm maintainers to go fix their rpm's an option?  As has
>been hashed out before, the only thing that makes plphp different from
>other pl's is that some of the current packagers are taking shortcuts
>with the packaging scripts which introduces dependency issues. IMHO what
>is included in the postgresql cvs and what is included in the main
>tarball for postgresql should not be dictated by outside packagers. 
>
>
>
>  
>

That wasn't my understanding of the previous discussion. Does not php 
require pg client support configured in at build time?

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement