Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date
Msg-id 200505032050.40769.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost wrote:
> Just to point it out, Debian handles circular dependencies like these
> without too much difficulty.  It's really only an issue when first
> building the various packages, and then you just build one without
> all the support initially, build the other, then rebuild the first
> with the support.

I don't really believe that.  People frequently do automated builds of 
the entire archive from scratch .  There cannot be true circular build 
dependencies.  That's the reason why the circular Qt <-> unixODBC 
dependency isn't resolved yet.

Of course, on Debian, this whole discussion is moot anyway because the 
php-pgsql client module is built from an independent source package for 
other historic reasons.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c?