Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0505030806400.478-100000@kix.fsv.cvut.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-advocacy
>
> Another example is the recent patch to check if there are orphaned file
> system files.  That was submitted, Tom had questions, I posted why I
> thought it was valid, and the patch is going in today.  Anyone has the
> ability to argue their point and try to sway the community, and any
> member has the right to request a vote on a specific issue.
>

I know so maintainig of PostgreSQL isn't easy. And it's normal so
everybody wont to see commit of your patch. The comunication with core
developers is best, but some times I have opinion so some patches are
lost - for example my little patch SQLSTATE, .. I remeber situation one
year ago with named params of plpgsql function. Patch waited half of year.

I don't wont to be negative :-)). PostgreSQL did big progress. Really. And
last modification of plpgsql helped my in work. But its human natural. I
looking for others nows. I am expectant for 2PC, hiearch queries, and ...
PostgreSQL isn't only sw for me, it's more like idol :-)

Best Regards,
Pavel Stehule



pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Held"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company