Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rosser Schwarz
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company
Date
Msg-id 37d451f7050502135864ef3ed3@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company
List pgsql-hackers
while you weren't looking, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Adjustments?

A couple slight tweaks and rephrasings:

<p>If you're looking for a PostgreSQL gatekeeper, central committe or
controlling company, give up; there isn't one. We do have a core
committe and don't hand out CVS commit privileges like candy, but this
is more for ease of administration than control. The project is driven
by the needs of the community of developers and users, which anyone
can join. All you need to do is subscribe to the mailing list(s) and
participate in the discussions.  (See the <a
href="http://www.postgresql.org/faqs.FAQ_DEV.html">Developer's FAQ</a>
for more information on how to get involved in PostgreSQL
development.)</p>

/rls

--
:wq

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvar Freude
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only.)