Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date
Msg-id 427669E3.5030308@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>
>>Any person can bring a patch and submit it, any person in the community
>>can argue for it and any person can take the time to fix it to the
>>specifications that core sets forth.
>
>
> True, but I don't think "core" sets the specifications.  Rather, it is
> the community that sets them, or agrees to them by not saying anything.

Well I can't concur with that. I can concur that may be what "core"
would want but I don't see that as what it is.

However that could could also be perception as it isn't really that
clear what core does except set the specification.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
Command Prompt, Inc.



--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement