Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement
Date
Msg-id 882.1115059819@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> As you've already observed, if Tom doesn't like something it's very unlikely
> to get through.

I lose my share of arguments --- in fact, in the twenty minutes since
your posting I already notice Bruce committing a patch I had objected to
;-).

Our process is not "democratic" in the sense of any random subscriber to
the mailing lists having the same vote as a core member --- and I'll bet
Boost doesn't run things that way either.  What we have is pretty
informal but I think it effectively gives more weight to the opinions of
those more involved in the project; which seems a good way to operate.
But there isn't anyone here who has an absolute veto, nor contrarily
anyone who can force things in unilaterally over strong objections.

> [ much good commentary snipped ]

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement