Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 July 2001

• 01:29   Re: RangeTblEntry modifications Alex Pilosov
• 03:47   Re: RangeTblEntry modifications Tom Lane
• 11:48   Re: RangeTblEntry modifications Alex Pilosov
• 12:28   Re: functions returning sets Tom Lane
• 22:27   Re: Now it's my turn... Vince Vielhaber

2 July 2001

• 12:09   Re: Now it's my turn... Jan Wieck
• 12:45   Re: Now it's my turn... Oleg Bartunov
• 14:50   Re: Now it's my turn... Lamar Owen
• 15:14   Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier Thomas Swan
• 15:46   Re: shared library strangeness? Bill Studenmund
• 15:51   tab Phillip F Jansen
• 16:31   Production Backup and Recovery P. Dwayne Miller
• 16:37   Re: Production Backup and Recovery Doug McNaught
• 16:40   Re: tab Peter Eisentraut
• 17:28   Re: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier Alex Pilosov
• 17:58   Re: shared library strangeness? ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:17   Re: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier Alex Pilosov
• 21:21   selecting from cursor Alex Pilosov

3 July 2001

• 00:41   Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Tom Lane
• 00:43   RE: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:51   Re: selecting from cursor Tom Lane
• 00:54   Re: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier Thomas Swan
• 01:17   Re: selecting from cursor Alex Pilosov
• 01:20   Re: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier Alex Pilosov
• 02:27   Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:49   JDBC Support - prepared Statements? Mariano Kamp
• 07:34   Re: JDBC Support - prepared Statements? Mariano Kamp
• 07:37   AW: selecting from cursor Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 12:12   Trigger Procedures question Jean-Francois Leveque
• 12:21   Re: selecting from cursor Alex Pilosov
• 12:40   Re: Trigger Procedures question Jan Wieck
• 13:02   Re: selecting from cursor Tom Lane
• 13:20   Re: AW: selecting from cursor Tom Lane
• 14:33   Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier Thomas Swan
• 14:44   Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier Alex Pilosov
• 14:46   Re: selecting from cursor Alex Pilosov
• 14:56   Re: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier Peter Eisentraut
• 14:59   Re: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier Alex Pilosov
• 15:42   Re: JDBC Support - prepared Statements? Bruce Momjian
• 16:07   Re: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Tom Lane
• 16:34   Re: selecting from cursor Tom Lane
• 16:42   RE: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:46   [OT] Any major users of postgresql? Joe Brenner
• 16:53   Re: selecting from cursor Alex Pilosov
• 17:14   Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? Bill Studenmund
• 17:35   Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? Naomi Walker
• 17:38   Re: selecting from cursor Tom Lane
• 18:01   Re: stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Tom Lane
• 18:28   how to monitor/examine the database Ilan Fait
• 18:29   Re: Backup and Recovery nj7e@yahoo.com (John Moore)
• 18:40   Re: [PATCH] Contrib C source for casting MONEY to INT[248] and FLOAT[48] David D. Kilzer
• 18:48   examine the PostgerSQL database Ilan Fait
• 18:53   funny (cache (?)) bug in postgres (7.x tested) RISKO Gergely
• 18:55   Most intelligent database technique: For PostgreSQL and MySQL alavoor
• 18:55   Re: Postgres to Dia UML Rod Taylor
• 18:57   New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR 
• 19:08   Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords missive@frontiernet.net (Lee Harr)
• 19:09   Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
• 19:10   Help with SI buffer overflow error Matthew T. O'Connor
• 19:11   RE: Re: Backup and Recovery Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:28   Help with SI buffer overflow error Matthew
• 19:38   Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:40   Re: Re: Backup and Recovery Rod Taylor
• 19:57   Re: funny (cache (?)) bug in postgres (7.x tested) Jan Wieck
• 20:28   Re: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Rod Taylor
• 20:37   Re: Re: Backup and Recovery ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:50   Re: funny (cache (?)) bug in postgres (7.x tested) Alex Pilosov
• 20:50   Re: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier Dmitry G. Mastrukov
• 20:58   Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Tom Lane
• 20:58   Re: funny (cache (?)) bug in postgres (7.x tested) Tom Lane
• 21:06   Re: funny (cache (?)) bug in postgres (7.x tested) Doug McNaught
• 21:12   Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? Joe Brenner
• 21:13   Re: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Alex Pilosov
• 21:20   Re: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier Peter Eisentraut
• 21:20   Re: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Tom Lane
• 21:22   Re: Help with SI buffer overflow error Tom Lane
• 21:34   UNDO and partially commited transactions Martín Marqués
• 21:54   Re: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Tom Lane
• 21:55   Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? Martín Marqués
• 22:10   Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? Bruce Momjian
• 22:29   RE: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Alex Pilosov
• 22:31   Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 22:39   Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 22:41   Re: stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Tom Lane
• 22:51   Re: stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:59   Re: UNDO and partially commited transactions Bruce Momjian

4 July 2001

• 00:05   Re: stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Bruce Momjian
• 00:43   WAL Question Harry Yau
• 00:57   RE: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:16   Re: stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Tom Lane
• 02:29   Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Tom Lane
• 07:38   AW: Re: Backup and Recovery Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:19   Get table/field-identifiers in uppercase Klaus Reger
• 08:40   RE: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? Colin Strickland
• 09:02   Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? Gunnar Rønning
• 09:22   RE: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Hiroshi Inoue
• 10:28   Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? Andrew McMillan
• 10:46   Re: Re: Backup and Recovery ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 11:01   Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? Colin Strickland
• 12:29   CREATE TABLE .. PRIMARY KEY quirk Colin Strickland
• 13:33   Strange query execution time Michel Soto
• 14:05   Re: Re: Backup and Recovery Bruce Momjian
• 14:19   Re: Re: Backup and Recovery Bruce Momjian
• 16:10   Re: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Tom Lane
• 16:26   Re: CREATE TABLE .. PRIMARY KEY quirk Tom Lane
• 22:42   Re: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Hiroshi Inoue

5 July 2001

• 00:05   Re: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Tom Lane
• 02:19   Re: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Bruce Momjian
• 03:44   Re: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Hiroshi Inoue
• 07:25   Re: stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:26   AW: Strange query execution time Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:42   AW: Re: Backup and Recovery Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:59   Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? Alessio Bragadini
• 11:27   AW: Re: Backup and Recovery Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 12:48   Re: stuck spin lock with many concurrent users Tom Lane
• 12:55   Re: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Tom Lane
• 13:14   Re: AW: Strange query execution time Tom Lane
• 13:51   Pg on SMP half-powered Víctor Romero
• 14:29   Using Explain P. Dwayne Miller
• 15:19   Re: Re: Backup and Recovery Naomi Walker
• 15:22   Re: Using Explain Tom Lane
• 15:38   Re: AW: Re: Backup and Recovery Bruce Momjian
• 16:34   Re: Pg on SMP half-powered The Hermit Hacker
• 16:35   Checking query results against selectivity estimate Peter Eisentraut
• 17:37   Re: Checking query results against selectivity estimate Tom Lane
• 18:47   RE: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:47   FE/BE protocol oddity Peter Eisentraut
• 19:30   Solaris source code Bruce Momjian
• 19:38   Re: FE/BE protocol oddity Tom Lane
• 20:19   Re: Solaris source code Naomi Walker
• 20:48   Re: Solaris source code Bruce Momjian
• 21:03   Re: Solaris source code ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 22:52   Re: Re: Backup and Recovery ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 23:15   Re: Re: Backup and Recovery Bruce Momjian

6 July 2001

• 00:21   Re: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:33   Re: Re: Backup and Recovery Tom Lane
• 01:54   Re: Re: Backup and Recovery ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 04:22   Proper use of select() parameter nfds? Matthew Hagerty
• 07:35   AW: Re: Backup and Recovery Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:38   Database Users Management and Privileges Jean-Francois Leveque
• 07:52   Re: Pg on SMP half-powered Víctor Romero
• 08:04   AW: Re: Backup and Recovery Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:37   Re: Pg on SMP half-powered Colin Strickland
• 09:52   Re: Re: Backup and Recovery Bruce Momjian
• 12:29   Re: AW: Re: Backup and Recovery Tom Lane
• 12:50   Re: Proper use of select() parameter nfds? Tom Lane
• 13:01   Re: Proper use of select() parameter nfds? Doug McNaught
• 13:14   AW: AW: Re: Backup and Recovery Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:25   AW: AW: Re: Backup and Recovery Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:36   Re: Proper use of select() parameter nfds? Alex Pilosov
• 13:46   Re: Database Users Management and Privileges Peter Eisentraut
• 14:08   Re: AW: AW: Re: Backup and Recovery Tom Lane
• 14:21   Re: Database Users Management and Privileges Gunnar Rønning
• 14:28   Re: Proper use of select() parameter nfds? Matthew Hagerty
• 15:03   Re: Proper use of select() parameter nfds? Doug McNaught
• 15:12   Re: Database Users Management and Privileges Peter Eisentraut
• 15:20   RE: AW: AW: Re: Backup and Recovery Mikheev, Vadim
• 15:50   Re: Database Users Management and Privileges Jean-Francois Leveque
• 15:55   amiint J-P Guguy
• 15:58   Re: FE/BE protocol oddity Peter Eisentraut
• 16:13   Problem with authentication in psql. Vitalino
• 16:50   Re: Problem with authentication in psql. Peter Eisentraut
• 17:29   Rule action ordering Tom Lane
• 17:33   Re: FE/BE protocol oddity Tom Lane
• 18:04   Re: Database Users Management and Privileges Gunnar Rønning
• 18:27   Re: FE/BE protocol oddity Peter Eisentraut
• 20:59   Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions Bruce Momjian
• 21:51   2 gig file size limit Naomi Walker
• 23:12   Re: 2 gig file size limit Larry Rosenman

7 July 2001

• 00:14   RE: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Alex Pilosov
• 02:08   Async PQgetResult() question. Matthew Hagerty
• 07:11   Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions Lincoln Yeoh
• 13:43   Re: Pg on SMP half-powered Lamar Owen
• 13:57   Re: 2 gig file size limit Lamar Owen
• 15:36   Re: Async PQgetResult() question. Tom Lane
• 16:39   Re: Async PQgetResult() question. Matthew Hagerty
• 17:13   Re: Async PQgetResult() question. Tom Lane
• 18:01   Re: Async PQgetResult() question. Matthew Hagerty
• 18:15   Re: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions Tom Lane
• 18:46   Re: Async PQgetResult() question. Tom Lane
• 19:14   Re: Async PQgetResult() question. Tom Lane
• 19:30   Re: Async PQgetResult() question. Matthew Hagerty

8 July 2001

• 00:13   RE: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Alex Pilosov
• 01:59   Re: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Rod Taylor
• 02:10   Re: selecting from cursor Alex Pilosov
• 02:31   Re: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Alex Pilosov
• 02:41   Re: selecting from cursor Alex Pilosov
• 02:44   Re: Async PQgetResult() question. Tom Lane
• 02:49   Re: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Rod Taylor
• 03:03   Re: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Rod Taylor
• 03:48   Re: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Tom Lane
• 10:37   Re: Pg on SMP half-powered Víctor Romero
• 15:02   Re: Async PQgetResult() question. Matthew Hagerty
• 19:48   Happy Anniversary Peter Eisentraut
• 20:20   Re: Happy Anniversary Bruce Momjian

9 July 2001

• 00:31   ADD CONSTRAINT behaviour question Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:47   RE: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:51   RE: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:58   Re: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions Tom Lane
• 00:58   RE: ADD CONSTRAINT behaviour question Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:02   Re: ADD CONSTRAINT behaviour question Tom Lane
• 09:31   AW: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 11:19   Re: Solaris source code Mathijs Brands
• 11:24   Re: Solaris source code Mathijs Brands
• 14:11   Re: AW: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Hannu Krosing
• 14:14   Re: AW: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Tom Lane
• 16:02   Re: AW: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Jan Wieck
• 17:43   Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy Bruce Momjian
• 19:00   Re: grant and SQL92 Bruce Momjian
• 19:21   Re: grant and SQL92 Vince Vielhaber
• 19:54   Re: Re: Backup and Recovery ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:04   Re: Improving pg_hba.conf Bruce Momjian
• 21:18   Re: AW: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Peter Eisentraut
• 21:23   Re: create user problem Bruce Momjian
• 22:27   timestamp not consistent with documentation or standard Dave Martin
• 23:11   Re: timestamp not consistent with documentation or standard Tom Lane

10 July 2001

• 01:03   More ADD CONSTRAINT behaviour questions Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:26   Mozilla 1.0 release soon? Bruce Momjian
• 01:32   Re: More ADD CONSTRAINT behaviour questions Tom Lane
• 01:43   Re: Mozilla 1.0 release soon? Thomas Lockhart
• 02:48   Re: More ADD CONSTRAINT behaviour questions Stephan Szabo
• 02:48   Re: Re: Mozilla 1.0 release soon? Bruce Momjian
• 02:48   Re: More ADD CONSTRAINT behaviour questions Bruce Momjian
• 03:30   WaitOnLock: error on wakeup Rachit Siamwalla
• 04:19   Repost: Get table/field-identifiers in uppercase Klaus Reger
• 08:15   Quick Question! Harry Yau
• 08:38   Re: Solaris source code Mathijs Brands
• 08:45   AW: Repost: Get table/field-identifiers in uppercase Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 11:38   Any tips for this particular performance problem? Sergio Bruder
• 12:10   Tips performance under solaris 
• 13:03   Re: Any tips for this particular performance problem? Hannu Krosing
• 13:16   Re: Any tips for this particular performance problem? Sergio Bruder
• 13:17   Re: WaitOnLock: error on wakeup Tom Lane
• 13:26   Re: Tips performance under solaris Bruce Momjian
• 13:34   Re: AW: Repost: Get table/field-identifiers in uppercase Tom Lane
• 13:48   Re: Tips performance under solaris Tom Lane
• 13:55   Re: Any tips for this particular performance problem? Jan Wieck
• 14:17   Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy Peter Eisentraut
• 14:18   AW: AW: pg_index.indislossy Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:27   Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy Bruce Momjian
• 15:10   Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy Peter Eisentraut
• 15:57   FE/BE protocol oddity Peter Eisentraut
• 16:14   Re: Any tips for this particular performance problem? Stephan Szabo
• 16:17   Re: AW: AW: pg_index.indislossy Bruce Momjian
• 17:08   Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy Bruce Momjian
• 17:10   Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy Tom Lane
• 17:20   SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
• 17:48   selecting from cursor/function Alex Pilosov
• 18:26   Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:00   Time to read pg_hba.conf (Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Patch to make...) Peter Eisentraut
• 19:25   Re: grant and SQL92 Peter Eisentraut
• 19:32   Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Bill Studenmund
• 19:34   Re: grant and SQL92 Vince Vielhaber
• 19:38   Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug Tom Lane
• 20:07   Strange query execution time Michel Soto
• 20:13   Re: JDBC Support - prepared Statements? Rainer Klute
• 20:23   Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Bruce Momjian
• 20:29   way to pass NEW into function Mike Cianflone
• 21:12   Re: Production Backup and Recovery John Moore
• 21:15   Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:23   SNMP support Kevin
• 21:25   RE: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR David Bennett
• 21:27   RE: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR David Bennett
• 21:29   Re: Backups WAS: 2 gig file size limit Joseph Shraibman
• 21:35   libpq autoconf scripts? Timothy H. Keitt
• 21:37   Re: grant and SQL92 Bruce Momjian
• 21:41   Re: Async PQgetResult() question. Matthew Hagerty
• 21:45   Re: timestamp with/without time zone Bruce Momjian
• 21:47   RE: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR David Bennett
• 21:47   Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
• 21:47   Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
• 21:51   Re: grant and SQL92 Vince Vielhaber
• 21:53   Re: Time to read pg_hba.conf (Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Patch to make...) Tom Lane
• 22:03   Re: JDBC Support - prepared Statements? Rainer Klute
• 22:09   RE: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR David Bennett
• 22:10   Re: JDBC Support - prepared Statements? Bruce Momjian
• 22:24   varchar vs. text Rachit Siamwalla
• 22:24   Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? John Moore
• 22:26   Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Bruce Momjian
• 22:34   i need help for JDBC ma li
• 22:38   Re: grant and SQL92 Bruce Momjian
• 22:53   Re: grant and SQL92 Vince Vielhaber
• 23:01   Re: way to pass NEW into function Larry Rosenman
• 23:02   Re: Strange query execution time Stephan Szabo
• 23:06   Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy Tom Lane
• 23:09   Re: timestamp with/without time zone Bruce Momjian
• 23:11   Re: Any tips for this particular performance problem? Ross J. Reedstrom
• 23:15   Re: Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? Tom Lane
• 23:18   Re: varchar vs. text Tom Lane
• 23:19   Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
• 23:22   Re: Re: Time to read pg_hba.conf (Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Patch to make...) Bruce Momjian
• 23:25   Re: grant and SQL92 Tom Lane
• 23:26   Postgresql bulk fast loader Naomi Walker
• 23:57   Re: Postgresql bulk fast loader mlw

11 July 2001

• 00:03   Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 00:09   Re: i need help for JDBC Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:15   Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Bruce Momjian
• 00:17   Re: [GENERAL] 2 gig file size limit Bruce Momjian
• 00:18   Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Ian Lance Taylor
• 00:23   Re: Postgresql bulk fast loader Bruce Momjian
• 00:34   Re: timestamp with/without time zone Thomas Lockhart
• 02:25   Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords michael@miknet.net (Michael Samuel)
• 02:32   Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords Bruce Momjian
• 03:15   docs Japanese translation Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:02   Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords michael@miknet.net (Michael Samuel)
• 10:22   Possible feature? Mike Mascari
• 10:59   Re: Any tips for this particular performance problem? Hannu Krosing
• 11:22   Re: New SQL Datatype RECURRINGCHAR Jan Wieck
• 11:25   AW: Possible feature? Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 11:47   Re: AW: Possible feature? Hannu Krosing
• 12:39   Re: Postgresql bulk fast loader Mark Volpe
• 12:49   Re: varchar vs. text Jan Wieck
• 13:42   Re: libpq autoconf scripts? Peter Eisentraut
• 14:07   Re: varchar vs. text Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:38   Re: varchar vs. text Rod Taylor
• 14:48   Re: Possible feature? Peter Eisentraut
• 14:54   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
• 14:59   vacuum problems Mark
• 15:13   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Peter Eisentraut
• 15:21   Re: varchar vs. text Jan Wieck
• 15:45   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
• 16:27   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Bruce Momjian
• 16:36   Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords Bruce Momjian
• 16:41   Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords Bruce Momjian
• 16:41   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
• 16:52   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Bruce Momjian
• 17:19   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact Bruce Momjian
• 17:37   LOG PgSql .. gabriel
• 17:38   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Peter Eisentraut
• 17:46   Re: [JDBC] Re: JDBC adaptor issue Bruce Momjian
• 17:52   iconv? Peter Eisentraut
• 18:14   Re: LOG PgSql .. Peter Eisentraut
• 19:20   I can't keep up Bruce Momjian
• 19:33   Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup Tom Lane
• 19:46   Re: I can't keep up Bruce Momjian
• 19:48   Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:51   Re: [PATCHES] Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions Peter Eisentraut
• 21:07   Re: [PATCHES] Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions Mark Volpe
• 21:34   Re: vacuum problems Mark
• 22:24   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 23:38   Possible bug in plpgsql/src/gram.y Ian Lance Taylor

12 July 2001

• 00:18   Re: Possible bug in plpgsql/src/gram.y Bruce Momjian
• 00:20   Re: Possible bug in plpgsql/src/gram.y Bruce Momjian
• 01:00   RE: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup Mikheev, Vadim
• 01:02   Re: docs Japanese translation Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:32   Re: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup Tom Lane
• 01:40   Re: Possible bug in plpgsql/src/gram.y Tom Lane
• 02:04   Re: iconv? Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:49   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages Bruce Momjian
• 02:50   Re: Possible bug in plpgsql/src/gram.y Bruce Momjian
• 04:11   Re: Possible feature? Klaus Reger
• 05:20   Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords michael@miknet.net (Michael Samuel)
• 07:41   Re: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup Vadim Mikheev
• 07:46   AW: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:41   Child itemid in update-chain marked as unused - can't continue repair_frag V. M.
• 11:01   Re: Possible bug in plpgsql/src/gram.y Jan Wieck
• 11:01   Re: Possible bug in plpgsql/src/gram.y Jan Wieck
• 13:47   Re: Child itemid in update-chain marked as unused - can't continue repair_frag Bruce Momjian
• 13:52   Re: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup Tom Lane
• 14:07   Re: [PATCHES] Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions Peter Eisentraut
• 14:26   Re: Child itemid in update-chain marked as unused - can't continue repair_frag Tom Lane
• 15:46   Prefixing libpq error message with function names Peter Eisentraut
• 16:09   Re: Prefixing libpq error message with function names Bruce Momjian
• 16:11   RE: Re: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:22   Rule recompilation Jan Wieck
• 16:24   Re: Re: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup Tom Lane
• 16:36   Re: Prefixing libpq error message with function names Tom Lane
• 16:36   RE: Re: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:55   RE: Rule recompilation Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:03   RE: Rule recompilation Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:05   Re: Rule recompilation Jan Wieck
• 17:13   Re: Rule recompilation Jan Wieck
• 17:19   Re: [PATCHES] Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions Bruce Momjian
• 17:20   Vacuum errors Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
• 17:24   Re: Rule recompilation Alex Pilosov
• 17:24   Re: Rule recompilation Alex Pilosov
• 17:26   RE: Rule recompilation Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:08   Re: Re: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup Tom Lane
• 18:11   Re: Rule recompilation Jan Wieck
• 18:29   Re: Rule recompilation Jan Wieck
• 18:38   Dependency tracking Jean-Michel POURE
• 18:43   select count... P. Dwayne Miller
• 18:58   RE: Re: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:00   Re: Re: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup Tom Lane
• 19:06   Re: Rule recompilation Tom Lane
• 19:13   Re: Rule recompilation Tom Lane
• 19:14   Re: Rule recompilation Tom Lane
• 19:20   Re: Rule recompilation Jan Wieck
• 19:21   Re: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions Bruce Momjian
• 19:26   Re: Rule recompilation Jan Wieck
• 19:27   Re: Rule recompilation Tom Lane
• 19:30   Re: Rule recompilation Alex Pilosov
• 19:32   Re: Rule recompilation Jan Wieck
• 19:35   Re: Rule recompilation Tom Lane
• 19:36   Re: Rule recompilation Peter Eisentraut
• 19:37   Re: Rule recompilation Tom Lane
• 19:38   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 19:44   Re: Rule recompilation Alex Pilosov
• 19:51   Re: Rule recompilation Tom Lane
• 20:00   RE: Re: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:31   Re: Rule recompilation Jean-Michel POURE
• 22:21   Re: Re: Postgresql bulk fast loader Guy Fraser
• 23:55   Re: Rule recompilation Hiroshi Inoue

13 July 2001

• 00:38   Re: Rule recompilation Tom Lane
• 01:15   Re: Rule recompilation Hiroshi Inoue
• 07:20   AW: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:36   AW: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 10:48   Re: AW: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) mlw
• 12:16   Re: select count... Doug McNaught
• 13:26   Re: select count... P. Dwayne Miller
• 13:38   Re: AW: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions Bruce Momjian
• 13:52   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 14:43   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX Thomas Lockhart
• 15:19   Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 15:33   Re: AW: AW: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions Bruce Momjian
• 15:45   Re: grant and SQL92 Peter Eisentraut
• 16:07   Re: iconv? Patrick Welche
• 16:22   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Peter Eisentraut
• 16:23   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX Bruce Momjian
• 16:30   Re: Re: select count... Hannu Krosing
• 16:37   Re: Re: select count... Tom Lane
• 16:49   AW: AW: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 16:54   Re: grant and SQL92 Bruce Momjian
• 17:31   Re: grant and SQL92 Peter Eisentraut
• 17:35   Re: grant and SQL92 Bruce Momjian
• 17:52   Problem with rules and conditions Tobias Hermansson
• 18:49   Re: iconv? Peter Eisentraut
• 19:26   Re: iconv? Bruce Momjian
• 19:55   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX Thomas Lockhart
• 20:00   Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX Bruce Momjian
• 20:13   Re: Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX Bruce Momjian
• 20:50   Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX Tom Lane
• 21:34   Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX Bruce Momjian
• 21:36   Planned changes to pg_am catalog Tom Lane
• 21:58   OID question Naomi Walker
• 22:19   Re: OID question Tom Lane
• 23:33   Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX Martijn van Oosterhout
• 23:35   Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX Martijn van Oosterhout
• 23:57   Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX Bruce Momjian

14 July 2001

• 01:05   Radical suggestion for plan executor? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 02:20   Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) mlw
• 02:22   Re: iconv? Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:54   Re: Radical suggestion for plan executor? Tom Lane
• 03:56   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
• 10:44   Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) mlw
• 12:40   Re: Planned changes to pg_am catalog Oleg Bartunov
• 13:16   Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX Bernard Frankpitt
• 14:38   Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
• 14:57   Re: Planned changes to pg_am catalog Tom Lane
• 16:02   Re: Planned changes to pg_am catalog Tom Lane

15 July 2001

• 01:30   Building PostgreSQL on WindowsNT P. Dwayne Miller
• 10:21   multibyte enhancement Tatsuo Ishii
• 11:01   Re: Problem with rules and conditions Jan Wieck
• 21:11   Translators wanted Peter Eisentraut
• 21:45   Re: iconv? Larry Rosenman
• 22:33   Re: Translators wanted Serguei Mokhov

16 July 2001

• 00:02   Re: iconv? Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:13   Re: iconv? Larry Rosenman
• 01:00   RE: Planned changes to pg_am catalog Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:02   pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 05:32   Re: Translators wanted Oleg Bartunov
• 09:31   Re: Translators wanted Alessio Bragadini
• 11:04   OLD in Triggers Bernie Warner
• 11:36   NetBSD 1.5.1(HP300) Larry Rosenman
• 13:08   handling NULLS in GiST Oleg Bartunov
• 13:44   AW: handling NULLS in GiST Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:56   Re: Planned changes to pg_am catalog Oleg Bartunov
• 14:01   Re: handling NULLS in GiST Tom Lane
• 14:19   Re: Planned changes to pg_am catalog Tom Lane
• 16:47   Re: handling NULLS in GiST Oleg Bartunov
• 16:57   ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN column SERIAL -- unexpected results Rod Taylor
• 17:13   Re: [GENERAL] 2 gig file size limit Neil Conway
• 17:48   Re: handling NULLS in GiST Tom Lane
• 18:26   OLD in Trigger Bernie Warner
• 18:36   PGSQL problem with weblogic and OID data type Sanath Peiris
• 19:12   What I do with PostgreSQL alex avriette
• 19:35   Re: NetBSD 1.5.1(HP300) Larry Rosenman
• 19:36   Re: pg_depend Peter Eisentraut
• 19:45   Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN column SERIAL -- unexpected results Tom Lane
• 19:52   Re: NetBSD 1.5.1(HP300) Peter Eisentraut
• 20:04   PostgreSQL : First impressions Huong Chia Hiang
• 20:18   Re: NetBSD 1.5.1(HP300) Larry Rosenman
• 20:35   Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN column SERIAL -- unexpected results Bruce Momjian
• 20:50   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 20:50   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:54   Re: NetBSD 1.5.1(HP300) Peter Eisentraut
• 21:05   Re: pg_depend Alex Pilosov
• 21:20   Re: pg_depend Peter Eisentraut
• 21:28   Re: pg_depend Alex Pilosov
• 22:14   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 22:23   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 22:25   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 22:45   Re: pg_depend Bill Studenmund
• 22:49   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 23:14   Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN column SERIAL -- unexpected results Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:54   Re: pg_depend Hiroshi Inoue

17 July 2001

• 00:49   Re: pg_depend Bill Studenmund
• 00:58   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 01:05   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 01:21   RE: pg_depend Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:23   Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN column SERIAL -- unexpected results Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:38   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
• 01:39   RE: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN column SERIAL -- unexpected results Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:58   Re: pg_depend Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:43   Odd error... Dominic J. Eidson
• 05:24   Re: Odd error... Philip Warner
• 05:49   Re: PGSQL problem with weblogic and OID data type Phillip F Jansen
• 11:06   deferencing array of int8 Christopher Yap
• 11:38   RE: JDBC Support - prepared Statements? Jon Folland
• 11:59   Re: Repost: Get table/field-identifiers in uppercase Klaus Reger
• 12:08   Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 12:25   Re: pg_depend Peter Eisentraut
• 12:37   Operator *= Luis Sousa
• 13:09   Re: Odd error... Dominic J. Eidson
• 13:47   SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function. spshealy@yahoo.com
• 14:18   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 15:41   Re: pg_depend Peter Eisentraut
• 16:00   Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN column SERIAL -- unexpected results Tom Lane
• 16:10   Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Tom Lane
• 16:17   Re: Odd error... Tom Lane
• 16:21   Re: What I do with PostgreSQL Lamar Owen
• 16:34   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 16:44   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Bruce Momjian
• 17:07   Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN column SERIAL -- unexpected results Peter Eisentraut
• 17:07   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 17:24   Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function. Tom Lane
• 17:34   Re: pg_depend Peter Eisentraut
• 17:50   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 17:52   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
• 18:35   RE: What I do with PostgreSQL Darren King
• 18:43   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 18:50   Re: Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Bruce Momjian
• 18:52   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Tom Lane
• 18:56   Re: pg_depend Peter Eisentraut
• 19:03   Execution statistics svanegmond@bang.dhs.org
• 19:03   Re: Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Bruce Momjian
• 19:20   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Tom Lane
• 19:20   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 19:27   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 19:30   Re: Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'emm Jan Wieck
• 19:50   Re: Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Tom Lane
• 21:32   Re: pg_depend Bill Studenmund
• 21:33   Re: pg_depend Bill Studenmund
• 22:13   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 22:23   Re: pg_depend Bill Studenmund
• 23:06   Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN column SERIAL -- unexpected results Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:46   Re: pg_depend Hiroshi Inoue

18 July 2001

• 00:50   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 01:13   MySQL Gemini code Bruce Momjian
• 01:24   Re: pg_depend Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:31   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 02:11   Re: pg_depend Philip Warner
• 05:47   Full Text Indexing Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:59   analyze strangeness Tim Allen
• 07:17   AW: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate ' em Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:27   Memory management jerome crouigneau
• 07:43   AW: Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recrea te 'emm Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:44   ERROR: SELECT DISTINCT ON with postgresql v 7.1.2 Jean-Michel Kelbert
• 08:21   ERROR: SELECT DISTINCT ON with postgresql v 7.1.2 Kelbert
• 09:47   Re: Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Gunnar Rønning
• 11:14   PQexec() 8191 bytes limit and text fields Steve Howe
• 11:29   Re: All computers in the world MUST sync with ATOMIC clock before 12:00 AM 21 July 2001!!! rick@edg.nl (Rick Schippers)
• 11:31   Re: MySQL Gemini code Jan Wieck
• 11:48   Re: All computers in the world MUST sync with ATOMIC clock before 12:00 AM 21 July 2001!!! Gorazd Bozic
• 12:03   C functions, variable number of params? mlw
• 13:49   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Patrick Macdonald
• 14:01   Re: pg_depend Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:04   Re: pg_depend Philip Warner
• 14:13   Re: pg_depend Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:17   Re: PQexec() 8191 bytes limit and text fields Mitch Vincent
• 14:50   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Tom Lane
• 14:59   Re: AW: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate ' em Tom Lane
• 15:51   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Bruce Momjian
• 15:57   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 16:02   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 16:03   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Patrick Macdonald
• 16:09   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Patrick Macdonald
• 16:13   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Bruce Momjian
• 16:22   Re: pg_depend Philip Warner
• 16:24   Re: Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Bruce Momjian
• 16:24   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 16:26   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 16:36   Re: analyze strangeness Tom Lane
• 16:38   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Bruce Momjian
• 16:40   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 16:47   Re: Full Text Indexing Tom Lane
• 17:06   Re: MySQL Gemini code Bruce Momjian
• 17:07   Re: ERROR: SELECT DISTINCT ON with postgresql v 7.1.2 Stephan Szabo
• 17:11   Re: PQexec() 8191 bytes limit and text fields Tom Lane
• 17:12   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 17:19   Re: MySQL Gemini code Jan Wieck
• 17:20   Re: pg_depend Bill Studenmund
• 17:21   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Bruce Momjian
• 17:37   Re: PQexec() 8191 bytes limit and text fields Steve Howe
• 17:37   OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 17:51   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 17:52   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 18:21   RE: pg_depend Hiroshi Inoue
• 18:30   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Lamar Owen
• 18:30   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 18:32   dependent dependants ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 18:36   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 18:42   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 19:23   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 19:36   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 19:50   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Larry Rosenman
• 19:53   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Rod Taylor
• 20:04   Re: MySQL Gemini code ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:17   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 20:20   Re: MySQL Gemini code ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:21   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Lamar Owen
• 20:24   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Larry Rosenman
• 20:24   Re: MySQL Gemini code Michael Widenius
• 20:24   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 20:32   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 20:33   Re: [HACKERS - GENERAL] PQexec() 8191 bytes limit and text fields Mitch Vincent
• 20:33   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 20:34   RE: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:38   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 20:53   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 21:25   RE: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:28   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Larry Rosenman
• 21:43   Re: MySQL Gemini code teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 22:12   Re: dependent dependants Tom Lane
• 22:19   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 22:27   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Lamar Owen
• 23:00   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 23:04   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 23:15   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 23:18   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Rod Taylor
• 23:21   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Ross J. Reedstrom
• 23:29   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 23:35   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 23:40   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 23:40   Re: MySQL Gemini code Jan Wieck
• 23:40   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 23:43   Re: MySQL Gemini code ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 23:45   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:49   Re: MySQL Gemini code Sascha Schumann
• 23:53   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 23:54   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:54   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 23:57   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 23:58   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane

19 July 2001

• 00:07   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 00:07   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:12   Re: MySQL Gemini code Michael Widenius
• 00:20   Visit to Red Hat Canada Bruce Momjian
• 00:23   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 00:38   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 01:24   Re: pg_depend Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:16   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Lincoln Yeoh
• 02:53   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:01   Re: Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Horst Herb
• 03:20   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 03:56   Re: MySQL Gemini code Michael Widenius
• 04:02   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 04:07   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Lamar Owen
• 04:16   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Lamar Owen
• 04:51   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Ashley Cambrell
• 05:22   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Philip Warner
• 05:35   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
• 11:31   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Daniel Kalchev
• 12:10   Re: pg_depend Philip Warner
• 13:24   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 14:15   Re: MySQL Gemini code Adrian Phillips
• 14:54   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) J-P Guy
• 14:55   RE: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Mikheev, Vadim
• 15:40   Re: [PATCHES] Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions Mark Volpe
• 16:10   Re: [PATCHES] Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions Tom Lane
• 16:36   Re: [PATCHES] Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions Mark Volpe
• 17:08   Turning off revision tracking so vacuum never needs to be run Mike Cianflone
• 17:18   RELAX! - or more to the point, how do I temporarily relax a trigger/constraint? Howard Williams
• 17:19   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 17:25   Re: pg_depend Bill Studenmund
• 17:40   Re: Turning off revision tracking so vacuum never needs to be run Tom Lane
• 22:43   Re: pg_depend Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:14   Re: pg_depend Ross J. Reedstrom
• 23:23   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue

20 July 2001

• 01:08   Re: pg_depend Bill Studenmund
• 02:18   hub.org out of disk space Tom Lane
• 06:02   Large queries - again... Steve Howe
• 09:31   problem with creating/dropping tables and plpgsql ? \(::\) Bob Ippolito
• 10:31   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Alessio Bragadini
• 10:33   Re: hub.org out of disk space Chris Bowlby
• 10:53   Re: Re: hub.org out of disk space Vince Vielhaber
• 11:09   Re: hub.org out of disk space The Hermit Hacker
• 12:32   C functions mlw
• 12:50   pg_dump(all) fails with "failed sanity chec, type with oid ..." Mark R DeLong
• 12:54   Ability to create tables Bruce Momjian
• 13:58   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 14:01   AW: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:01   Added TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 14:35   Re: Large queries - again... Tom Lane
• 15:04   Re: Re: hub.org out of disk space Lamar Owen
• 15:23   Re: problem with creating/dropping tables and plpgsql ? Tom Lane
• 15:40   BUG (fixed) in CREATE TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT...(v-7.0.2) jozzano
• 15:57   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 16:12   Re: Large queries - again... Eduardo Stern
• 16:23   BUG (fixed) in CREATE TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT...(v-7.0.2) jozzano
• 16:55   Re: All computers in the world MUST sync with ATOMIC clock before 12:00 AM 21 July 2001!!! Justin Koivisto
• 17:13   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Horst Herb
• 17:26   Neutral Soil (OT) August Zajonc
• 17:27   Re: BUG (fixed) in CREATE TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT...(v-7.0.2) Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: Large queries - again... Steve Howe
• 17:59   Re: C functions Tom Lane
• 18:02   Re: Large queries - again... Steve Howe
• 18:02   Re: Large queries - again... Tom Lane
• 19:27   Re: Large queries - again... Tom Lane
• 21:01   Re: Large queries - again... Steve Howe
• 21:21   Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l) Lamar Owen
• 21:53   Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l) Tom Lane
• 21:55   Re: Large queries - again... Bruce Momjian
• 22:05   Re: Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l) teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 22:08   Re: Large queries - again... Tom Lane
• 22:54   Re: Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l) ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 22:56   Re: Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l) Lamar Owen
• 22:59   Re: Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l) Tom Lane
• 23:31   Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l) Thomas Lockhart

21 July 2001

• 02:32   IDEA: Multi-master replication possible through spread (or even master-slave)... Sean Chittenden
• 02:47   Re: Large queries - again... Steve Howe
• 03:52   Re: Large queries - again... Bruce Momjian
• 04:12   Re: IDEA: Multi-master replication possible through spread (or even master-slave)... Sean Chittenden
• 04:52   Re: Large queries - again... Steve Howe
• 05:02   Re: IDEA: Multi-master replication possible through spread (or even master-slave)... Darren Johnson
• 05:30   RE: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
• 10:11   Re: Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l) Lamar Owen
• 13:21   plpgsql: RAISE  Richard Huxton
• 14:09   Re: Large queries - again... Tom Lane
• 14:53   Re: plpgsql: RAISE  Tom Lane
• 17:31   Re: Large queries - again... Bruce Momjian
• 17:45   sub queries and caching. mlw
• 19:46   WIN32 errno patch Tom Lane
• 20:39   Re: WIN32 errno patch Bruce Momjian
• 21:03   Incomplete idea about views and INSERT...RETURNING Tom Lane
• 21:09   Re: WIN32 errno patch Tom Lane
• 23:23   Re: Incomplete idea about views and INSERT...RETURNING Philip Warner
• 23:28   Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function. Tatsuo Ishii

22 July 2001

• 10:10   Re: Pgbench Performance on PGSQL Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:10   Re: Multibyte in postgresql Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:10   Re: Thai data import into PostgreSQL Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:21   Re: [BUGS] libpgtcl doesn't use UTF encoding of TCL Tatsuo Ishii
• 17:03   Re: Incomplete idea about views and INSERT...RETURNING Andrew McMillan
• 17:26   Re: sub queries and caching. mlw
• 21:50   Re: Incomplete idea about views and INSERT...RETURNING Tom Lane

23 July 2001

• 01:05   RE: More ADD CONSTRAINT behaviour questions Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:59   Re: Improving pg_hba.conf David Ford
• 02:01   Re: Improving pg_hba.conf Bruce Momjian
• 02:21   Re: More ADD CONSTRAINT behaviour questions Tom Lane
• 05:13   Large objects and table deletion. Grant
• 05:27   Re: Improving pg_hba.conf David Ford
• 08:56   Re: Improving pg_hba.conf Bruce Momjian
• 10:01   Re: unique index doesn't accept functions on fields Alessio Bragadini
• 10:01   Re: Neutral Soil (OT) Alessio Bragadini
• 10:30   RE: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Henshall, Stuart - WCP
• 10:43   Re: Large queries - again... Jan Wieck
• 12:21   Re: IDEA: Multi-master replication possible through spread (or even master-slave)... Darren Johnson
• 12:23   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) jmscott@yahoo.com (jmscott@REMOVEMEyahoo.com)
• 12:25   unique index doesn't accept functions on fields domingo@dad-it.com (Domingo Alvarez Duarte)
• 12:40   Re: [BUGS] libpgtcl doesn't use UTF encoding of TCL Eugene Fokin
• 12:52   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Patrick Macdonald
• 12:58   Fw: Leaking Handles in Postgres 7.1.2 on Cygwin dll 1.3.2 on Win 2000 eCommerce Software Solutions Inc.
• 13:22   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Patrick Macdonald
• 15:30   Question about porting the PostgreSQL Hsin Lee
• 16:13   Re: plpgsql: RAISE  Jan Wieck
• 16:28   Re: plpgsql: RAISE  Richard Huxton
• 18:42   Re: Large queries - again... Steve Howe
• 22:02   Does/Can PG store administrative statistics? reina@nsi.edu (Tony Reina)

24 July 2001

• 00:27   RE: Re: unique index doesn't accept functions on fields Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:36   Re: RE: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:51   plpgsql. Bill Shui
• 01:59   Bug in psql tab completion Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:54   Re: plpgsql. Thomas Swan
• 06:50   RE: RE: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Henshall, Stuart - WCP
• 08:20   Re: sub queries and caching. mlw
• 12:23   Storing XML in PostgreSQL Jean-Michel POURE
• 13:36   RAISE : state of play and request for advice Richard Huxton
• 23:17   Re: plpgsql: RAISE  Tom Lane

25 July 2001

• 00:15   RE: Thai data import into PostgreSQL Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:39   Re: Question about porting the PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 08:02   Re: Storing XML in PostgreSQL John Gray
• 08:59   plpgsql: Checking status on a 'INSERT INTO ...' Turbo Fredriksson
• 09:06   Re: plpgsql: Checking status on a 'INSERT INTO ...' Reinoud van Leeuwen
• 11:40   Has anybody gop PL/Python to work on linux/pg7.1.2 ? Hannu Krosing
• 12:02   Re: Re: Storing XML in PostgreSQL Gunnar Rønning
• 12:48   plpgsql: Debug function? Turbo Fredriksson
• 13:18   PostgreSQL 7.0 problem (may be bug?) Vladimir V. Zolotych
• 14:22   Re: plpgsql: Debug function? Turbo Fredriksson
• 14:26   Re: plpgsql: Debug function? Joel Burton
• 14:38   Re: PostgreSQL 7.0 problem (may be bug?) Tom Lane
• 14:56   Re: plpgsql: Debug function? Joel Burton
• 15:10   Re: Re: plpgsql: Debug function? Tom Lane
• 15:42   Can Postgres handle 2-phase commits ? Howard Williams
• 16:31   Re: Re: Storing XML in PostgreSQL John Gray
• 21:50   Re: Bug in psql tab completion Bruce Momjian
• 22:09   Re: [GENERAL] Bad timestamp external representation Bruce Momjian
• 22:31   Re: Bad timestamp external representation ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)

26 July 2001

• 00:49   Re: Slow Performance in PostgreSQL Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:31   LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries Steve Howe
• 03:46   Re: Slow Performance in PostgreSQL Thomas Lockhart
• 03:50   Bug in ADD COLUMN with REFERENCES Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:32   AW: Re: Slow Performance in PostgreSQL Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:03   ... Zudi Iswanto
• 09:17   Re: Re: plpgsql: Debug function? Turbo Fredriksson
• 09:47   plpgsql: 'SELECT * FROM tbl' Turbo Fredriksson
• 11:01   Release of 7.2 mlw
• 11:01   Linking a shared library against a C function John Gray
• 11:30   Re: Release of 7.2 Turbo Fredriksson
• 11:56   Re: Release of 7.2-Not released!!! Just a Question! mlw
• 15:00   Re: Can Postgres handle 2-phase commits ? Keith G. Murphy
• 16:01   Re: Re: Storing XML in PostgreSQL John Gray
• 18:40   Re: Patrick Welche
• 18:46   RE: LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries Khoa Do
• 19:37   RE: LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries Joel Burton
• 20:30   Re: Re: Re: Storing XML in PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 20:38   Re: Bad timestamp external representation Bruce Momjian
• 20:55   Re: Release of 7.2 Bruce Momjian
• 21:13   Re: Bad timestamp external representation ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 21:26   Failed compile PostgreSQL 7.1.2 on AIX 5.1 BigWhat.com
• 22:43   Re: Bad timestamp external representation Bruce Momjian

27 July 2001

• 01:19   Re: Bad timestamp external representation Philip Warner
• 01:36   pltcl - lastoid bob@redivi.com
• 02:41   Re: Failed compile PostgreSQL 7.1.2 on AIX 5.1 Dominic J. Eidson
• 04:36   Re: LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries Tom Lane
• 07:15   Re: LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries Joerg Hessdoerfer
• 08:13   Re: LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:04   Re: Slow Performance in PostgreSQL Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:13   indexes and big tables Robert Vojta
• 10:20   AW: indexes and big tables Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 11:05   From TODO, XML? mlw
• 11:31   Re: indexes and big tables Robert Vojta
• 11:57   Re: indexes and big tables Robert Vojta
• 12:01   Re: Re: Re: Storing XML in PostgreSQL Colin 't Hart
• 12:02   Re: indexes and big tables Robert Vojta
• 13:56   PostgreSQL7.1 on AIX5L is running with too poor ferformance Leslie
• 14:59   Re: indexes and big tables Stephan Szabo
• 16:01   (forw) Caldera OpenUNIX 8 Larry Rosenman
• 17:36   Re: From TODO, XML? jgray@beansindustry.co.uk
• 17:53   Re: Re: Re: Storing XML in PostgreSQL John Gray
• 18:49   config.guess on OpenUnix 8... Larry Rosenman
• 19:37   RE: Question about porting the PostgreSQL Hsin Lee
• 20:47   OU8... Larry Rosenman
• 23:09   Re: From TODO, XML? mlw

28 July 2001

• 01:24   Re: From TODO, XML? fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
• 06:29   Re: From TODO, XML? mlw
• 08:28   ... Zudi Iswanto
• 09:49   Re: indexes and big tables Robert Vojta

29 July 2001

• 03:50   Re: Re: plpgsql: Debug function? Bill Studenmund
• 14:52   Re: Re: From TODO, XML? Ken Hirsch
• 15:52   Re: Re: From TODO, XML? mlw
• 18:49   Re: Re: From TODO, XML? Ross J. Reedstrom
• 19:02   Re: From TODO, XML? mlw
• 19:06   Re: LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries Tom Lane
• 22:54   Re: LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:57   Re: LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries Tom Lane

30 July 2001

• 02:19   Re: From TODO, XML? Bruce Momjian
• 02:22   Re: Re: Re: Re: Storing XML in PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 02:38   Re: OU8... Bruce Momjian
• 02:54   Re: Re: Re: Storing XML in PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 03:12   Re: Re: From TODO, XML? Bruce Momjian
• 03:37   Re: PostgreSQL7.1 on AIX5L is running with too poor ferformance Tom Lane
• 03:37   Re: Re: From TODO, XML? Bruce Momjian
• 03:54   Re: Re: From TODO, XML? mlw
• 04:32   Re: Re: From TODO, XML? Gavin Sherry
• 07:40   Re: Re: From TODO, XML? Karel Zak
• 07:40   Re: From TODO, XML? mlw
• 08:10   Portal question Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 12:18   Re: PostgreSQL7.1 on AIX5L is running with too poor ferformance Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:12   Re: Re: From TODO, XML? Bruce Momjian
• 14:28   Re: From TODO, XML? jgray@beansindustry.co.uk
• 14:29   Re: Portal question Mitch Vincent
• 14:40   Re: OU8... Bruce Momjian
• 14:57   Re: Re: Re: Storing XML in PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 14:59    BigWhat.com
• 15:51   Performance TODO items Bruce Momjian
• 16:26   Re: Performance TODO items Bruce Momjian
• 16:43   RE: Performance TODO items Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:45   Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function. Bill Studenmund
• 16:46   RE: Performance TODO items Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:58   Re: Performance TODO items Bruce Momjian
• 17:36   RE: Performance TODO items Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:01   Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function. Tom Lane
• 18:24   Re: Performance TODO items Tom Lane
• 18:29   Re: Performance TODO items Tom Lane
• 18:47   RE: Performance TODO items Darren King
• 20:10   Re: Performance TODO items Bruce Momjian
• 20:14   Re: Performance TODO items Bruce Momjian
• 20:53   Re: Performance TODO items Tom Lane
• 21:11   Re: Performance TODO items Bruce Momjian
• 21:13   Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function. Bill Studenmund
• 21:40   Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function. Tom Lane
• 22:14   Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function. Tom Lane
• 22:16   developer's website Vince Vielhaber
• 22:34   Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function. Bill Studenmund
• 22:42   Autoconf 2.50 is out (was Re: [PATCHES] Re: OpenUnix 8 Patch) Tom Lane
• 22:45   Re: Autoconf 2.50 is out (was Re: [PATCHES] Re: OpenUnix 8 Patch) Larry Rosenman
• 23:00   Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function. Bruce Momjian
• 23:13   Re: developer's website bpalmer
• 23:14   Re: developer's website Vince Vielhaber
• 23:17   Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function. Tom Lane
• 23:24   Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function. Bruce Momjian
• 23:43   vacuumlo. Grant
• 23:53   Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function. Tom Lane

31 July 2001

• 00:29   Re: vacuumlo. Tom Lane
• 00:52   Re: vacuumlo. Grant
• 01:21   Re: vacuumlo. Tom Lane
• 03:15   Re: vacuumlo. Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:57   Re: vacuumlo. Grant
• 04:23   Re: Returned mail: User unknown Grant
• 04:50   Re: Re: Returned mail: User unknown Tom Lane
• 08:12   Re: Performance TODO items Matthew Kirkwood
• 12:35   Re: Re: Returned mail: User unknown Bruce Momjian
• 12:48   Re: vacuumlo. Bruce Momjian
• 12:55   Re: From TODO, XML? mlw
• 13:03   Re: Performance TODO items Bruce Momjian
• 13:19   [Fwd: Majordomo Delivery Error] Timothy H. Keitt
• 14:32   Re: Re: From TODO, XML? Gilles DAROLD
• 14:33   Re: [Fwd: Majordomo Delivery Error] Tom Lane
• 14:54   Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only) Tom Lane
• 14:56   Re: [Fwd: Majordomo Delivery Error] Vince Vielhaber
• 15:19   Re: From TODO, XML? mlw
• 15:21   Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only) Bruce Momjian
• 15:36   Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only) Bruce Momjian
• 15:45   Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only) Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: Re: Returned mail: User unknown Marc G. Fournier
• 17:57   Update to 7.1.2 Question... gabriel
• 18:26   Re: Update to 7.1.2 Question... teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 18:59   Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only) Oliver Elphick
• 20:21   Re: Update to 7.1.2 Question... mlw
• 22:05   pg_hba.conf pre-parsing change Tom Lane
• 22:13   Re: Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only) Bruce Momjian
• 22:14   Re: pg_hba.conf pre-parsing change Bruce Momjian
• 22:20   Re: pg_hba.conf pre-parsing change Tom Lane
• 22:39   Re: Re: pg_hba.conf pre-parsing change Bruce Momjian
• 22:40   Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only) Tom Lane
• 22:44   Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only) Bruce Momjian
• 22:52   Re: Re: pg_hba.conf pre-parsing change Lamar Owen
• 22:55   Re: Re: pg_hba.conf pre-parsing change Tom Lane
• 23:52   Re: Re: pg_hba.conf pre-parsing change Bruce Momjian