Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)
Date
Msg-id 18418.994865097@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)  (Ian Lance Taylor <ian@zembu.com>)
Responses Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Ian Lance Taylor <ian@zembu.com> writes:
> But I wouldn't worry about it, and I wouldn't worry about Nathan's
> suggestion for making the limit configurable, because Postgres
> connections don't spend time on the queue.  The postgres server will
> be picking them off as fast as it can.  If the server can't pick
> processes off fast enough, then your system has other problems;

Right.  Okay, it seems like just making it a hand-configurable entry
in config.h.in is good enough for now.  When and if we find that
that's inadequate in a real-world situation, we can improve on it...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible feature?
Next
From: Mark
Date:
Subject: vacuum problems