Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0107111814370.679-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Right.  Okay, it seems like just making it a hand-configurable entry
> in config.h.in is good enough for now.  When and if we find that
> that's inadequate in a real-world situation, we can improve on it...

Would anything computed from the maximum number of allowed connections
make sense?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark
Date:
Subject: vacuum problems
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: varchar vs. text