Re: vacuumlo. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: vacuumlo.
Date
Msg-id 3721.996546092@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: vacuumlo.  (Grant <grant@conprojan.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Grant <grant@conprojan.com.au> writes:
> Can you see a scenario where a programmer would forget to delete the
> data from pg_largeobject and the database becoming very large filled
> with orphaned large objects?

Sure.  My point wasn't that the functionality isn't needed, it's that
I'm not sure vacuumlo does it well enough to be ready to promote to
the status of mainstream code.  It needs more review and testing before
we can move it out of /contrib.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Grant
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuumlo.
Next
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuumlo.