Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From jmscott@yahoo.com (jmscott@REMOVEMEyahoo.com)
Subject Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Date
Msg-id 4ae2330f.0107191934.c43fbb@posting.google.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
lamar.owen@wgcr.org (Lamar Owen) wrote in message news:<01071818103609.00973@lowen.wgcr.org>...

> [trimmed cc:list]

> On Wednesday 18 July 2001 17:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > OK, we need to vote on whether Oid's are optional, and whether we can

> > have them not created by default.

> 

> [All the below IMHO]

> 

> OID's should be optional.


yep.  we don't depend upon oids > 32 bits.  that's pretty standard
practice for serious db apps.  however, tx limit is a real problem.

my vote is for solving the tx limit before chaning the oid problem.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Darren Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: IDEA: Multi-master replication possible through spread (or even master-slave)...
Next
From: domingo@dad-it.com (Domingo Alvarez Duarte)
Date:
Subject: unique index doesn't accept functions on fields