Bruce Momjian writes:
> > That was me. The point, however, was, given object id 145928, how the
> > heck to you know what table this comes from?
>
> I think we will need the relid of the system table. I imagine four
> columns:
>
> object relid
> object oid
> reference relid
> references oid
I'm not seeing the point. You're essentially duplicating the information
that's already available in the system catalogs. This is bound to become
a catastrophe the minute a user steps in and does manual surgery on some
catalog. (And yes, manual surgery should still be possible.)
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
