Re: Rule recompilation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Wieck
Subject Re: Rule recompilation
Date
Msg-id 200107121757.f6CHv2V04751@jupiter.us.greatbridge.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Rule recompilation  ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
Mikheev, Vadim wrote:
> >     Anyway,  what's  the preferred syntax for triggering the rule
> >     recompilation?  I thought about
> >
> >         ALTER RULE {rulename|ALL} RECOMPILE;
> >
> >     Where ALL triggers only those rules where the  user  actually
> >     has RULE access right on a relation.
>
> In good world rules (PL functions etc) should be automatically
> marked as dirty (ie recompilation required) whenever referenced
> objects are changed.
   Yepp,  and  it'd  be possible for rules (just not right now).   But we're not in  a  really  good  world,  so  it'll
not  be   possible for PL's.
 


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Rule recompilation
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions